9eb6572786
Add back remark unintentionally dropped by 644a965c1e.
I will add a LV test separately, so we do not have to rely on a Clang
test to catch this.
23 lines
1.2 KiB
C
23 lines
1.2 KiB
C
// REQUIRES: x86-registered-target
|
|
// RUN: %clang -O1 -fvectorize -target x86_64-unknown-unknown -mllvm -vectorize-memory-check-threshold=8 -Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize -emit-llvm -S %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: {{.*}}:10:11: remark: loop not vectorized: cannot prove it is safe to reorder floating-point operations; allow reordering by specifying '#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)' before the loop or by providing the compiler option '-ffast-math'.
|
|
|
|
double foo(int N) {
|
|
double v = 0.0;
|
|
|
|
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
|
|
v = v + 1.0;
|
|
|
|
return v;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: {{.*}}:18:3: remark: loop not vectorized: cannot prove it is safe to reorder memory operations; allow reordering by specifying '#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable)' before the loop. If the arrays will always be independent specify '#pragma clang loop vectorize(assume_safety)' before the loop or provide the '__restrict__' qualifier with the independent array arguments. Erroneous results will occur if these options are incorrectly applied!
|
|
|
|
void foo2(int *dw, int *uw, int *A, int *B, int *C, int *D, int N) {
|
|
for (long i = 0; i < N; i++) {
|
|
dw[i] = A[i] + B[i - 1] + C[i - 2] + D[i - 3];
|
|
uw[i] = A[i] + B[i + 1] + C[i + 2] + D[i + 3];
|
|
}
|
|
}
|