Files
clang-p2996/clang/test/SemaTemplate/partial-spec-instantiate.cpp
Aaron Ballman 0f1c1be196 [clang] Remove rdar links; NFC
We have a new policy in place making links to private resources
something we try to avoid in source and test files. Normally, we'd
organically switch to the new policy rather than make a sweeping change
across a project. However, Clang is in a somewhat special circumstance
currently: recently, I've had several new contributors run into rdar
links around test code which their patch was changing the behavior of.
This turns out to be a surprisingly bad experience, especially for
newer folks, for a handful of reasons: not understanding what the link
is and feeling intimidated by it, wondering whether their changes are
actually breaking something important to a downstream in some way,
having to hunt down strangers not involved with the patch to impose on
them for help, accidental pressure from asking for potentially private
IP to be made public, etc. Because folks run into these links entirely
by chance (through fixing bugs or working on new features), there's not
really a set of problematic links to focus on -- all of the links have
basically the same potential for causing these problems. As a result,
this is an omnibus patch to remove all such links.

This was not a mechanical change; it was done by manually searching for
rdar, radar, radr, and other variants to find all the various
problematic links. From there, I tried to retain or reword the
surrounding comments so that we would lose as little context as
possible. However, because most links were just a plain link with no
supporting context, the majority of the changes are simple removals.

Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D158071
2023-08-28 12:13:42 -04:00

155 lines
4.1 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
// PR4607
template <class T> struct X {};
template <> struct X<char>
{
static char* g();
};
template <class T> struct X2 {};
template <class U>
struct X2<U*> {
static void f() {
X<U>::g();
}
};
void a(char *a, char *b) {X2<char*>::f();}
namespace WonkyAccess {
template<typename T>
struct X {
int m;
};
template<typename U>
class Y;
template<typename U>
struct Y<U*> : X<U> { };
template<>
struct Y<float*> : X<float> { };
int f(Y<int*> y, Y<float*> y2) {
return y.m + y2.m;
}
}
namespace rdar9169404 {
template<typename T, T N> struct X { };
template<bool C> struct X<bool, C> {
typedef int type;
};
X<bool, -1>::type value;
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
// expected-error@-2 {{non-type template argument evaluates to -1, which cannot be narrowed to type 'bool'}}
#endif
}
namespace rdar39524996 {
template <typename T, typename U>
struct enable_if_not_same
{
typedef void type;
};
template <typename T>
struct enable_if_not_same<T, T>;
template <typename T>
struct Wrapper {
// Assertion triggered on trying to set twice the same partial specialization
// enable_if_not_same<int, int>
template <class U>
Wrapper(const Wrapper<U>& other,
typename enable_if_not_same<U, T>::type* = 0) {}
explicit Wrapper(int i) {}
};
template <class T>
struct Container {
// It is important that the struct has implicit copy and move constructors.
Container() : x() {}
template <class U>
Container(const Container<U>& other) : x(static_cast<T>(other.x)) {}
// Implicit constructors are member-wise, so the field triggers instantiation
// of T constructors and we instantiate all of them for overloading purposes.
T x;
};
void takesWrapperInContainer(const Container< Wrapper<int> >& c);
void test() {
// Type mismatch triggers initialization with conversion which requires
// implicit constructors to be instantiated.
Container<int> c;
takesWrapperInContainer(c);
}
}
namespace InstantiationDependent {
template<typename> using ignore = void; // expected-warning 0-1{{extension}}
template<typename T, typename = void> struct A {
static const bool specialized = false;
};
template<typename T> struct Hide { typedef void type; };
template<typename T> struct A<T, Hide<ignore<typename T::type> >::type> {
static const bool specialized = true;
};
struct X {};
struct Y { typedef int type; };
_Static_assert(!A<X>::specialized, "");
_Static_assert(A<Y>::specialized, "");
}
namespace IgnorePartialSubstitution {
template <typename... T> struct tuple {}; // expected-warning 0-1{{extension}}
template <typename> struct IsTuple {
enum { value = false };
};
template <typename... Us> struct IsTuple<tuple<Us...> > { // expected-warning 0-1{{extension}}
enum { value = true };
};
template <bool...> using ignore = void; // expected-warning 0-2{{extension}}
template <class... Pred> ignore<Pred::value...> helper(); // expected-warning 0-1{{extension}}
using S = IsTuple<tuple<int> >; // expected-warning 0-1{{extension}}
// This used to pick the primary template, because we got confused and
// thought that template parameter 0 was the current partially-substituted
// pack (from `helper`) during the deduction for the partial specialization.
void f() { helper<S>(); }
_Static_assert(S::value, "");
}
namespace GH60778 {
template <bool B = false> class ClassTemplate {
public:
template <typename T, typename = void> class Nested {};
};
template <typename DerivedType> class Base {};
template <>
template <typename T>
class ClassTemplate<>::Nested<T> : public Base<ClassTemplate<>::Nested<T> > {};
void use() {
// This should instantiate the body of Nested with the template arguments
// from the Partial Specialization. This would previously get confused and
// get the template arguments from the primary template instead.
ClassTemplate<>::Nested<int> instantiation;
}
}