9d4a2baaa2
Uses of these markers are contrary to all other llvm-project subprojects and carry no information for people who know the basics of a lit test. I understand that there is an argument "this makes beginners get started quickly" but I am unsure whether this is strong enough to deviate from all other projects. https://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html covers the basics. Actually, some contributors were confused by the markers. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128763
24 lines
1014 B
Fortran
24 lines
1014 B
Fortran
! RUN: %flang_fc1 -fdebug-dump-parse-tree %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PARSE_TREE
|
|
! RUN: %flang_fc1 -fdebug-dump-pft %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PFT
|
|
! RUN: bbc -pft-test %s 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PFT
|
|
|
|
! PFT: 1 Subroutine test_routine: subroutine test_routine(a, b, n)
|
|
! PFT-NEXT: 1 EndSubroutineStmt: end subroutine
|
|
! PRF-NEXT: End Subroutine test_routine
|
|
! PFT-NO: Program -> ProgramUnit -> SubroutineSubprogram
|
|
|
|
! PARSE_TREE: Program -> ProgramUnit -> SubroutineSubprogram
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | SubroutineStmt
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | | Name = 'test_routine'
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | | DummyArg -> Name = 'a'
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | | DummyArg -> Name = 'b'
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | | DummyArg -> Name = 'n'
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | SpecificationPart
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | | ImplicitPart ->
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | ExecutionPart -> Block
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NEXT: | EndSubroutineStmt ->
|
|
! PARSE_TREE-NO: Subroutine test_routine: subroutine test_routine(a, b, n)
|
|
|
|
subroutine test_routine(a, b, n)
|
|
end subroutine
|