Files
clang-p2996/lld/test/ELF/lto/codemodel.ll
Fangrui Song 78762357d4 [ELF] Support placing .lbss/.lrodata/.ldata after .bss
https://reviews.llvm.org/D150510 places .lrodata before .rodata to
minimize the number of permission transitions in the memory image.
However, this layout is less ideal for -fno-pic code (which is still
important).

Small code model -fno-pic code has R_X86_64_32S relocations with a range
of `[0,2**31)` (if we ignore the negative area). Placing `.lrodata`
earlier exerts relocation pressure on such code. Non-x86 64-bit
architectures generally have a similar `[0,2**31)` limitation if they
don't use PC-relative relocations.

If we place .lrodata later, we will need one extra PT_LOAD. Two layouts
are appealing:

* .bss/.lbss/.lrodata/.ldata (GNU ld)
* .bss/.ldata/.lbss/.lrodata

The GNU ld layout has the nice property that there is only one BSS
(except .tbss/.relro_padding). Add -z lrodata-after-bss to support
this layout.

Since a read-only PT_LOAD segment (for large data sections) may appear
after RW PT_LOAD segments. The placement of `_etext` has to be adjusted.

Pull Request: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81224
2024-02-20 13:59:49 -08:00

21 lines
665 B
LLVM

; REQUIRES: x86
; RUN: llvm-as %s -o %t.o
; RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %ts -mllvm -code-model=small
; RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %tl -mllvm -code-model=large
; RUN: llvm-objdump -d %ts | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-SMALL
; RUN: llvm-objdump -d %tl | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-LARGE
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
@data = internal constant [0 x i32] []
define ptr @_start() nounwind readonly {
entry:
; CHECK-SMALL-LABEL: <_start>:
; CHECK-SMALL: movl ${{.*}}, %eax
; CHECK-LARGE-LABEL: <_start>:
; CHECK-LARGE: movabsq ${{.*}}, %rax
ret ptr @data
}