Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/revisit.ll
Yashwant Singh aea2a14736 [LoopUnroll] Prevent LoopFullUnrollPass to perform partial/runtime unrolling
FullLoopUnroll was performing runtime unrolling in certain cases when
'#pragma unroll' was specified. Patch to fix this by introducing new parameter
to tryToUnrollLoop() to differentiate between LoopUnrollPass and
FullLoopUnrollPass. Based on the discussion here
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/loop-unroller-fails-to-unroll-loop/69834)

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148071
2023-04-13 10:21:24 +05:30

73 lines
1.9 KiB
LLVM

; This test checks that nested loops are revisited in various scenarios when
; unrolling. Note that if we ever start doing outer loop peeling a test case
; for that should be added here.
;
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output -debug-pass-manager 2>&1 \
; RUN: -passes='require<opt-remark-emit>,loop(loop-unroll-full)' \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s
;
; Basic test is fully unrolled and we revisit the post-unroll new sibling
; loops, including the ones that used to be child loops.
define void @full_unroll(ptr %ptr) {
; CHECK-LABEL: OptimizationRemarkEmitterAnalysis on full_unroll
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
entry:
br label %l0
l0:
%cond.0 = load volatile i1, ptr %ptr
br i1 %cond.0, label %l0.0.ph, label %exit
l0.0.ph:
br label %l0.0
l0.0:
%iv = phi i32 [ %iv.next, %l0.0.latch ], [ 0, %l0.0.ph ]
%iv.next = add i32 %iv, 1
br label %l0.0.0.ph
l0.0.0.ph:
br label %l0.0.0
l0.0.0:
%cond.0.0.0 = load volatile i1, ptr %ptr
br i1 %cond.0.0.0, label %l0.0.0, label %l0.0.1.ph
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0.0
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
l0.0.1.ph:
br label %l0.0.1
l0.0.1:
%cond.0.0.1 = load volatile i1, ptr %ptr
br i1 %cond.0.0.1, label %l0.0.1, label %l0.0.latch
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0.1
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
l0.0.latch:
%cmp = icmp slt i32 %iv.next, 2
br i1 %cmp, label %l0.0, label %l0.latch
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
;
; Unrolling occurs, so we visit what were the inner loops twice over. First we
; visit their clones, and then we visit the original loops re-parented.
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0.1.1
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0.0.1
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0.1
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0.0.0
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
l0.latch:
br label %l0
; CHECK: LoopFullUnrollPass on l0
; CHECK-NOT: LoopFullUnrollPass
exit:
ret void
}