It is more useful to use ComplexType as type of the attribute than to use the element type as attribute type. This means when using this attribute in complex::ConstantOp, we just need to check whether the types match. Reviewed By: pifon2a Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130703
20 lines
523 B
MLIR
20 lines
523 B
MLIR
// RUN: mlir-opt %s -split-input-file -allow-unregistered-dialect -verify-diagnostics | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
func.func @number_attr_f64() {
|
|
"test.number_attr"() {
|
|
// CHECK: attr = #complex.number<:f64 1.000000e+00, 0.000000e+00> : complex<f64>
|
|
attr = #complex.number<:f64 1.0, 0.0>
|
|
} : () -> ()
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func.func @number_attr_f32() {
|
|
"test.number_attr"() {
|
|
// CHECK: attr = #complex.number<:f32 1.000000e+00, 0.000000e+00> : complex<f32>
|
|
attr = #complex.number<:f32 1.0, 0.0>
|
|
} : () -> ()
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
}
|