Files
clang-p2996/llvm/test/Transforms/SROA/phi-catchswitch.ll
Heejin Ahn c3a68c5d63 [SROA] Bail out on PHIs in catchswitch BBs
In the process of rewriting `alloca`s and `phi`s that use them, the SROA
pass can try to insert a non-PHI instruction by calling
`getFirstInsertionPt()`, which is not possible in a catchswitch BB. This
CL makes we bail out on these cases.

Reviewed By: dschuff

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117168
2022-01-14 14:55:07 -08:00

46 lines
1.7 KiB
LLVM

; RUN: opt < %s -sroa -S | FileCheck %s
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-n32:64-S128"
target triple = "wasm32-unknown-unknown"
%struct.foo = type { i32 }
declare i32 @__gxx_wasm_personality_v0(...)
declare void @foo()
; Tests if the SROA pass correctly bails out on rewriting PHIs in a catchswitch
; BB.
; CHECK-LABEL: @test_phi_catchswitch
define void @test_phi_catchswitch() personality i8* bitcast (i32 (...)* @__gxx_wasm_personality_v0 to i8*) {
entry:
; CHECK: alloca
%tmp = alloca %struct.foo, align 4
%tmp2 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.foo, %struct.foo* %tmp, i32 0, i32 0
invoke void @foo()
to label %bb3 unwind label %bb10
bb3: ; preds = %entry
invoke void @foo()
to label %bb9 unwind label %catch.dispatch
catch.dispatch: ; preds = %bb3
; While rewriting the alloca in the entry BB, the SROA pass tries to insert a
; non-PHI instruction in this BB by calling getFirstInsertionPt(), which is
; not possible in a catchswitch BB. This test checks if we correctly bail out
; on these cases.
%tmp5 = phi i32* [ %tmp2, %bb3 ]
%tmp6 = catchswitch within none [label %catch.start] unwind label %bb10
catch.start: ; preds = %catch.dispatch
%tmp8 = catchpad within %tmp6 [i8* null]
unreachable
bb9: ; preds = %bb3
unreachable
bb10: ; preds = %catch.dispatch, %entry
%tmp11 = phi i32* [ %tmp2, %entry ], [ %tmp5, %catch.dispatch ]
%tmp12 = cleanuppad within none []
store i32 0, i32* %tmp11, align 4
unreachable
}