Files
clang-p2996/clang/test/SemaTemplate/member-access-expr.cpp
Richard Smith 23d6525cbd Don't form a 'context-independent expr' reference to a member during
name annotation.

Instead, defer forming the member access expression or DeclRefExpr until
we build the use of ClassifyName's result. Just build an
UnresolvedLookupExpr to track the LookupResult until we're ready to
consume it.

This also reverts commit 2f7269b677 (other
than its testcase). That change was an attempted workaround for the same
problem.
2020-07-27 19:38:22 -07:00

174 lines
3.4 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
template<typename T>
void call_f0(T x) {
x.Base::f0();
}
struct Base {
void f0();
};
struct X0 : Base {
typedef Base CrazyBase;
};
void test_f0(X0 x0) {
call_f0(x0);
}
template<typename TheBase, typename T>
void call_f0_through_typedef(T x) {
typedef TheBase Base2;
x.Base2::f0();
}
void test_f0_through_typedef(X0 x0) {
call_f0_through_typedef<Base>(x0);
}
template<typename TheBase, typename T>
void call_f0_through_typedef2(T x) {
typedef TheBase CrazyBase;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{lookup from the current scope refers here}}
#endif
x.CrazyBase::f0(); // expected-error 2{{no member named}}
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-error@-2 {{lookup of 'CrazyBase' in member access expression is ambiguous}}
#endif
}
struct OtherBase { };
struct X1 : Base, OtherBase {
typedef OtherBase CrazyBase;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-note@-2 {{lookup in the object type 'X1' refers here}}
#endif
};
void test_f0_through_typedef2(X0 x0, X1 x1) {
call_f0_through_typedef2<Base>(x0);
call_f0_through_typedef2<OtherBase>(x1); // expected-note{{instantiation}}
call_f0_through_typedef2<Base>(x1); // expected-note{{instantiation}}
}
struct X2 {
operator int() const;
};
template<typename T, typename U>
T convert(const U& value) {
return value.operator T(); // expected-error{{operator long}}
}
void test_convert(X2 x2) {
convert<int>(x2);
convert<long>(x2); // expected-note{{instantiation}}
}
template<typename T>
void destruct(T* ptr) {
ptr->~T();
ptr->T::~T();
}
template<typename T>
void destruct_intptr(int *ip) {
ip->~T();
ip->T::~T();
}
void test_destruct(X2 *x2p, int *ip) {
destruct(x2p);
destruct(ip);
destruct_intptr<int>(ip);
}
// PR5220
class X3 {
protected:
template <int> float* &f0();
template <int> const float* &f0() const;
void f1() {
(void)static_cast<float*>(f0<0>());
}
void f1() const{
(void)f0<0>();
}
};
// Fun with template instantiation and conversions
struct X4 {
int& member();
float& member() const;
};
template<typename T>
struct X5 {
void f(T* ptr) { int& ir = ptr->member(); }
void g(T* ptr) { float& fr = ptr->member(); }
};
void test_X5(X5<X4> x5, X5<const X4> x5c, X4 *xp, const X4 *cxp) {
x5.f(xp);
x5c.g(cxp);
}
// In theory we can do overload resolution at template-definition time on this.
// We should at least not assert.
namespace test4 {
struct Base {
template <class T> void foo() {}
};
template <class T> struct Foo : Base {
void test() {
foo<int>();
}
};
}
namespace test5 {
template<typename T>
struct X {
using T::value;
T &getValue() {
return &value;
}
};
}
// PR8739
namespace test6 {
struct A {};
struct B {};
template <class T> class Base;
template <class T> class Derived : public Base<T> {
A *field;
void get(B **ptr) {
// It's okay if at some point we figure out how to diagnose this
// at instantiation time.
*ptr = field; // expected-error {{incompatible pointer types assigning to 'test6::B *' from 'test6::A *'}}
}
};
}
namespace test7 {
struct C { void g(); };
template<typename T> struct A {
T x;
static void f() {
(x.g()); // expected-error {{invalid use of member 'x' in static member function}}
}
};
void h() { A<C>::f(); }
}