Files
clang-p2996/lldb/test/API/functionalities/thread/backtrace_limit/TestBacktraceLimit.py
Jordan Rupprecht 1eeeab82c6 [lldb][test] Modernize assertEqual(value, bool) (#82526)
Any time we see the pattern `assertEqual(value, bool)`, we can replace
that with `assert<bool>(value)`. Likewise for `assertNotEqual`.

Technically this relaxes the test a bit, as we may want to make sure
`value` is either `True` or `False`, and not something that implicitly
converts to a bool. For example, `assertEqual("foo", True)` will fail,
but `assertTrue("foo")` will not. In most cases, this distinction is not
important.

There are two such places that this patch does **not** transform, since
it seems intentional that we want the result to be a bool:
*
5daf2001a1/lldb/test/API/python_api/sbstructureddata/TestStructuredDataAPI.py (L90)
*
5daf2001a1/lldb/test/API/commands/settings/TestSettings.py (L940)

Followup to 9c2468821e. I patched `teyit`
with a `visit_assertEqual` node handler to generate this.
2024-02-21 20:39:02 -06:00

28 lines
942 B
Python

"""
Test that the target.process.thread.max-backtrace-depth setting works.
"""
import lldb
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
class BacktraceLimitSettingTest(TestBase):
NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE = True
def test_backtrace_depth(self):
"""Test that the max-backtrace-depth setting limits backtraces."""
self.build()
self.main_source_file = lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp")
(target, process, thread, bkpt) = lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
self, "Set a breakpoint here", self.main_source_file
)
interp = self.dbg.GetCommandInterpreter()
result = lldb.SBCommandReturnObject()
interp.HandleCommand(
"settings set target.process.thread.max-backtrace-depth 30", result
)
self.assertTrue(result.Succeeded())
self.assertEqual(30, thread.GetNumFrames())