Revert "[analyzer] Make it a noop when initializing a field of empty record" (#138951)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#138594 Crashes, see: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/144/builds/24534
This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
|
||||
//
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/AST/AttrIterator.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/AST/DeclCXX.h"
|
||||
#include "clang/AST/ParentMap.h"
|
||||
@@ -716,11 +715,7 @@ void ExprEngine::handleConstructor(const Expr *E,
|
||||
// actually make things worse. Placement new makes this tricky as well,
|
||||
// since it's then possible to be initializing one part of a multi-
|
||||
// dimensional array.
|
||||
const CXXRecordDecl *TargetHeldRecord =
|
||||
cast<CXXRecordDecl>(CE->getType()->getAsRecordDecl());
|
||||
|
||||
if (!TargetHeldRecord || !TargetHeldRecord->isEmpty())
|
||||
State = State->bindDefaultZero(Target, LCtx);
|
||||
State = State->bindDefaultZero(Target, LCtx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Bldr.generateNode(CE, N, State, /*tag=*/nullptr,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=cplusplus -verify %s
|
||||
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=cplusplus -verify %s -DEMPTY_CLASS
|
||||
// UNSUPPORTED: system-windows
|
||||
// expected-no-diagnostics
|
||||
|
||||
// This test reproduces the issue that previously the static analyzer
|
||||
// initialized an [[no_unique_address]] empty field to zero,
|
||||
// over-writing a non-empty field with the same offset.
|
||||
|
||||
namespace std {
|
||||
#ifdef EMPTY_CLASS
|
||||
|
||||
struct default_delete {};
|
||||
template <class _Tp, class _Dp = default_delete >
|
||||
#else
|
||||
// Class with methods and static members is still empty:
|
||||
template <typename T>
|
||||
class default_delete {
|
||||
T dump();
|
||||
static T x;
|
||||
};
|
||||
template <class _Tp, class _Dp = default_delete<_Tp> >
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
class unique_ptr {
|
||||
[[no_unique_address]] _Tp * __ptr_;
|
||||
[[no_unique_address]] _Dp __deleter_;
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
explicit unique_ptr(_Tp* __p) noexcept
|
||||
: __ptr_(__p),
|
||||
__deleter_() {}
|
||||
|
||||
~unique_ptr() {
|
||||
delete __ptr_;
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct X {};
|
||||
|
||||
int main()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Previously a leak falsely reported here. It was because the
|
||||
// Static Analyzer engine simulated the initialization of
|
||||
// `__deleter__` incorrectly. The engine assigned zero to
|
||||
// `__deleter__`--an empty record sharing offset with `__ptr__`.
|
||||
// The assignment over wrote `__ptr__`.
|
||||
std::unique_ptr<X> a(new X());
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user