definition below all of the header #include lines, Polly edition.
If you want to know more details about this, you can see the recent
commits to Debug.h in LLVM. This is just the Polly segment of a cleanup
I'm doing globally for this macro.
llvm-svn: 206852
This replaces the ancient INVALID/INVALID_NOVERIFY macros with a real
function.
The new invalid(..) function uses small diagnostic objects that are
generated on demand. We can store arbitrary additional information per
error type and generate useful debug/error messages on the fly.
Use it as follows:
if (/* Some error condition (ReportFoo) */)
invalid<ReportFoo>(Context, /*Assert=*/true/false,
(/* List of helpful diagnostic objects */));
Where ReportFoo is a subclass of RejectReason that is able to take the
list of helpful diagnostic objects in its constructor.
The implementation of invalid will create the report and fire
an assertion, if necessary.
llvm-svn: 205414
We mostly iterate over read-only values. Following a suggestion by Duncan P.N
Exons Smith, we use the construct 'const auto &' for this.
llvm-svn: 202651
clang-format requires a space before the ":" in the foreach loop. Even though
this is surprising to me, we follow this style to make our formatting
consistent with clang-format. I found that this clang-format style is used in a
couple of C++11 examples, hence I believe the fact that clang-format adds a
colon is not a bug but just something I was not used to yet.
llvm-svn: 202648
In rare cases the modification of one scop can effect the validity of other
scops, as code generation of an earlier scop may make the scalar evolution
functions derived for later scops less precise. The example that triggered this
patch was a scop that contained an 'or' expression as follows:
%add13710 = or i32 %j.19, 1
--> {(1 + (4 * %l)),+,2}<nsw><%for.body81>
Scev could only analyze the 'or' as it knew %j.19 is a multiple of 2. This
information was not available after the first scop was code generated (or
independent-blocks was run on it) and SCEV could not derive a precise SCEV
expression any more. This means we could not any more code generate this SCoP.
My current understanding is that there is always the risk that an earlier code
generation change invalidates later scops. As the example we have seen here is
difficult to avoid, we use this occasion to guard us against all such
invalidations.
This patch "solves" this issue by verifying right before we start working on
a detected scop, if this scop is in fact still valid. This adds a certain
overhead. However the verification we run is anyways very fast and secondly
it is only run on detected scops. So the overhead should not be very large. As
a later optimization we could detect scops only on demand, such that we need
to run scop-detections always only a single time.
This should fix the single last failure in the LLVM test-suite for the new
scev-based code generation.
llvm-svn: 201593
In rare cases, a region R which is itself not valid has an indirect child region
that is valid. When R becomes part of a valid region by expansion of another
region, then all children of R have to be erased from the set of valid regions.
This patch ensures that indirect children are erased in addition to direct
children.
Contributed-by: Armin Groesslinger <armin.groesslinger@uni-passau.de>
Tobias: I added a reduced test case and adjusted the logic of the patch to
only recurse until the first child is found.
llvm-svn: 200411
Verification of base addresses is difficult as the independent blocks pass may
introduce aliasing that was not there during scop detection. As a midterm
solution -polly-codegen-scev will remove the need for the independent blocks
pass. For now, we do not verify at compile time that the independent blocks pass
does not make the base addresses loop invariant. Disabling this just removes
one of the multiple safety layers we have. We still can check for correctness
in our regression tests.
llvm-svn: 200315
Array base addresses need to be invariant in the region considered. The base
address has to be computed outside the region, or, when it is computed inside,
the value must not change with the iterations of the loops. For example, when a
two-dimensional array is represented as a pointer to pointers the base address
A[i] in an access A[i][j] changes with i; therefore, such regions have to be
rejected.
Contributed by: Armin Größlinger <armin.groesslinger@uni-passau.de>
llvm-svn: 200314
This fixes a crash that appeared when generating dotty graphs for functions
without loops (for which we do not calculate polyhedral information).
llvm-svn: 198364
We now report the following:
$ polly-clang -O3 -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-report test.c -c \
-gline-tables-only
note: Polly detected an optimizable loop region (scop) in function 'foo'
test.c:2: Start of scop
test.c:3: End of scop
note: Polly detected an optimizable loop region (scop) in function 'bar'
test.c:9: Start of scop
test.c:13: End of scop
llvm-svn: 197558
String operations resulted by raw_string_ostream in the INVALID macro can lead
to significant compile-time overhead when compiling large size source code.
This is because raw_string_ostream relies on TypeFinder class, whose
compile-time cost increases as the size of the module increases. This patch
targets to ensure that it only track detection failures if actually needed.
In this way, we can avoid expensive string operations in normal execution.
With this patch file, the relative compile-time cost of Polly-detect pass does
not increase even when compiling very large size source code.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 187102
When a region header is part of a loop, then all entering edges of this region
should not come from the loop but outside the region. Otherwise, the loop may be
only partially part of the region, which would cause troubles in handling
induction variables.
Currently, we can only model induction variables that are either fully part of
the scop (loop induction variable) or induction variables that are scop-
invariant (parameter). A loop that is only partially part of the
scop causes troubles, as there is no good way to handle the induction
variable in the independent blocks pass.
Contributed-by: Star Tan <tanmx_star@yeah.net>
llvm-svn: 183800
