Commit Graph

1807 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adrian Prantl
9eddc8b9bf [lldb] Expose structured command diagnostics via the SBAPI. (#112109)
This allows IDEs to render LLDB expression diagnostics to their liking
without relying on characterprecise ASCII art from LLDB. It is exposed
as a versioned SBStructuredData object, since it is expected that this
may need to be tweaked based on actual usage.
2024-10-14 16:29:26 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
c2750807ba [lldb] Rename CommandReturnObject::Get.*Data -> Get.*String (#112062)
In a later commit, I want to add a method to access diagnostics as
actual structured data, which will make these function names rather
confusing.
2024-10-12 13:36:33 -07:00
Jason Molenda
3bef742559 Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)"
Reverting this again; I added a commit which added @skipIfDarwin
markers to the TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py and
TestReverseContinueNotSupported.py API tests, which use lldb-server
in gdbserver mode which does not work on Darwin.  But the aarch64 ubuntu
bot reported a failure on TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py,
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/6397

  File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 63, in test_reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint
    self.reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal(async_mode=False)
  File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/reverse-execution/TestReverseContinueBreakpoints.py", line 81, in reverse_continue_skip_breakpoint_internal
    self.expect(
  File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 2372, in expect
    self.runCmd(
  File "/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/lldb-aarch64-ubuntu/llvm-project/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/lldbtest.py", line 1002, in runCmd
    self.assertTrue(self.res.Succeeded(), msg + output)
AssertionError: False is not true : Process should be stopped due to history boundary
Error output:
error: Process must be launched.

This reverts commit 4f297566b3.
2024-10-10 16:24:38 -07:00
Robert O'Callahan
4f297566b3 [lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)
This commit only adds support for the
`SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this
will follow in a later commit.

This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing
support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support
those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing
purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python
implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use
by *tests only*.

The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950
lines added).
2024-10-10 16:08:19 -07:00
Augusto Noronha
2ff4c25b7e Revert "[lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)"
This reverts commit d5e1de6da9.
2024-10-10 15:05:58 -07:00
Robert O'Callahan
d5e1de6da9 [lldb] Implement basic support for reverse-continue (#99736)
This commit only adds support for the
`SBProcess::ReverseContinue()` API. A user-accessible command for this
will follow in a later commit.

This feature depends on a gdbserver implementation (e.g. `rr`) providing
support for the `bc` and `bs` packets. `lldb-server` does not support
those packets, and there is no plan to change that. So, for testing
purposes, `lldbreverse.py` wraps `lldb-server` with a Python
implementation of *very limited* record-and-replay functionality for use
by *tests only*.

The majority of this PR is test infrastructure (about 700 of the 950
lines added).
2024-10-10 13:01:47 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
c77b107461 [lldb] Introduce an always-on system log category/channel (#108495)
Add an "always on" log category and channel. Unlike other, existing log
channels, it is not exposed to users. The channel is meant to be used
sparsely and deliberately for logging high-value information to the
system log.

We have a similar concept in the downstream Swift fork and this has
proven to be extremely valuable. This is especially true on macOS where
system log messages are automatically captured as part of a sysdiagnose.
2024-10-10 08:47:30 -07:00
AbdAlRahman Gad
6f2ebc435f [lldb] Change SymbolContext::GetAddressRangeFromHereToEndLine to return Expected (NFC) (#110718)
Signed-off-by: AbdAlRahman Gad <abdobngad@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Prantl <adrian.prantl@gmail.com>
2024-10-08 10:04:52 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
8789c96698 [lldb] Unify implementation of CommandReturnObject::SetError(NFC) (#110707)
This is a cleanup that moves the API towards value semantics.
2024-10-02 09:11:47 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
d33fa70ddd [lldb] Inline expression evaluator error visualization (#106470)
This patch is a reworking of Pete Lawrence's (@PortalPete) proposal
for better expression evaluator error messages:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80938

Before:

```
$ lldb -o "expr a+b"
(lldb) expr a+b
error: <user expression 0>:1:1: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
a+b
^
error: <user expression 0>:1:3: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
a+b
  ^
```

After:

```
(lldb) expr a+b
            ^ ^
            │ ╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
            ╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
```

This eliminates the confusing `<user expression 0>:1:3` source
location and avoids echoing the expression to the console again, which
results in a cleaner presentation that makes it easier to grasp what's
going on. You can't see it here, bug the word "error" is now also in
color, if so desired.

Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106442.
2024-09-27 18:09:52 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
41dca012e5 Revert "[lldb] Inline expression evaluator error visualization (#106470)"
This reverts commit 49372d1ccc.
2024-09-27 17:05:37 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
49372d1ccc [lldb] Inline expression evaluator error visualization (#106470)
This patch is a reworking of Pete Lawrence's (@PortalPete) proposal
for better expression evaluator error messages:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80938

Before:

```
$ lldb -o "expr a+b"
(lldb) expr a+b
error: <user expression 0>:1:1: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
a+b
^
error: <user expression 0>:1:3: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
a+b
  ^
```

After:

```
(lldb) expr a+b
            ^ ^
            │ ╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'b'
            ╰─ error: use of undeclared identifier 'a'
```

This eliminates the confusing `<user expression 0>:1:3` source
location and avoids echoing the expression to the console again, which
results in a cleaner presentation that makes it easier to grasp what's
going on. You can't see it here, bug the word "error" is now also in
color, if so desired.

Depends on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106442.
2024-09-27 16:32:35 -07:00
Pavel Labath
df6822f4eb [lldb] Fix error reporting in SBTarget::ReadMemory (#109764)
The function should use the by-ref SBError argument instead of creating
a new one. This code has been here since ~forever, and was probably
copied from methods which return an SBError result (where one needs to
create a local variable).
2024-09-25 08:31:42 +02:00
jeffreytan81
b6bf27ef3c Avoid expression evaluation in libStdC++ std::vector<bool> synthetic children provider (#108414)
Our customers is reporting a serious performance issue (expanding a this
pointer takes 70 seconds in VSCode) in a specific execution context.

Profiling shows the hot path is triggered by an expression evaluation
from libStdC++ synthetic children provider for `std::vector<bool>` since
it uses `CreateValueFromExpression()`.

This PR added a new `SBValue::CreateBoolValue()` API and switch
`std::vector<bool>` synthetic children provider to use the new API
without performing expression evaluation.

Note: there might be other cases of `CreateValueFromExpression()` in our
summary/synthetic children providers which I will sweep through in later
PRs.

With this PR, the customer's scenario reduces from 70 seconds => 50
seconds. I will add other PRs to further optimize the remaining 50
seconds (mostly from type/namespace lookup).

Testing:

`test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-stl/libstdcpp/vbool/TestDataFormatterStdVBool.py`
passes with the PR

---------

Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
2024-09-13 10:26:01 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
96b7c64b8a [LLDB] Reapply SBSaveCore Add Memory List (#107937)
Recently in #107731 this change was revereted due to excess memory size
in `TestSkinnyCore`. This was due to a bug where a range's end was being
passed as size. Creating massive memory ranges.

Additionally, and requiring additional review, I added more unit tests
and more verbose logic to the merging of save core memory regions.

@jasonmolenda as an FYI.
2024-09-11 10:33:19 -07:00
Daniil Fukalov
345cc47ba7 [NFC] Add explicit #include llvm-config.h where its macros are used, lldb part. (#107603)
(this is lldb part)

Without these explicit includes, removing other headers, who implicitly
include llvm-config.h, may have non-trivial side effects. For example,
`clangd` may report even `llvm-config.h` as "no used" in case it defines
a macro, that is explicitly used with #ifdef. It is actually amplified
with different build configs which use different set of macros.
2024-09-09 12:44:03 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere
bb343468ff Revert "[LLDB] Reappply SBSaveCore AddMemoryList" (#107731)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#107159 as this is still causing
`TestSkinnyCorefile.py` to time out.


https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/11099/

https://ci.swift.org/view/all/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/5544/
2024-09-07 17:10:20 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
d4d4e77918 [LLDB] Reappply SBSaveCore AddMemoryList (#107159)
Reapplies #106293, testing identified issue in the merging code. I used
this opportunity to strip CoreFileMemoryRanges to it's own file and then
add unit tests on it's behavior.
2024-09-06 09:04:33 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
b798f4bd50 [lldb] Make deep copies of Status explicit (NFC) (#107170) 2024-09-05 12:44:13 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
a0dd90eb7d [lldb] Make conversions from llvm::Error explicit with Status::FromEr… (#107163)
…ror() [NFC]
2024-09-05 12:19:31 -07:00
Jonas Devlieghere
130eddf7a1 [lldb] Deal with SupportFiles in SourceManager (NFC) (#106740)
To support detecting MD5 checksum mismatches, deal with SupportFiles
rather than a plain FileSpecs in the SourceManager.
2024-08-30 10:58:32 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
b959532484 Revert "[LLDB][SBSaveCore] Add selectable memory regions to SBSaveCor… (#106293)
Reverts #105442. Due to `TestSkinnyCoreFailing` and root causing of the
failure will likely take longer than EOD.
2024-08-27 14:23:00 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
0642cd768b [lldb] Turn lldb_private::Status into a value type. (#106163)
This patch removes all of the Set.* methods from Status.

This cleanup is part of a series of patches that make it harder use the
anti-pattern of keeping a long-lives Status object around and updating
it while dropping any errors it contains on the floor.

This patch is largely NFC, the more interesting next steps this enables
is to:
1. remove Status.Clear()
2. assert that Status::operator=() never overwrites an error
3. remove Status::operator=()

Note that step (2) will bring 90% of the benefits for users, and step
(3) will dramatically clean up the error handling code in various
places. In the end my goal is to convert all APIs that are of the form

`    ResultTy DoFoo(Status& error)
`
to

`    llvm::Expected<ResultTy> DoFoo()
`
How to read this patch?

The interesting changes are in Status.h and Status.cpp, all other
changes are mostly

` perl -pi -e 's/\.SetErrorString/ = Status::FromErrorString/g' $(git
grep -l SetErrorString lldb/source)
`
plus the occasional manual cleanup.
2024-08-27 10:59:31 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
d517b22411 [LLDB][SBSaveCore] Add selectable memory regions to SBSaveCore (#105442)
This patch adds the option to specify specific memory ranges to be
included in a given core file. The current implementation lets user
specified ranges either be in addition to a certain save style, or
independent of them via the newly added custom enum.

To achieve being inclusive of save style, I've moved from a std::vector
of ranges to a RangeDataVector, and to join overlapping ranges to
prevent duplication of memory ranges in the core file.

As a non function bonus, when SBSavecore was initially created, the
header was included in the lldb-private interfaces, and I've fixed that
and moved it the forward declare as an oversight. CC @bulbazord in case
we need to include that into swift.
2024-08-27 07:33:12 -07:00
Adrian Prantl
3c0fba4f24 Revert "Revert "[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)""
This reverts commit 547917aebd.
2024-08-23 11:06:01 -07:00
Dmitri Gribenko
547917aebd Revert "[lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)"
This reverts commit f01f80ce6c.

This commit introduces an msan violation. See the discussion on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104523.
2024-08-22 13:24:57 +02:00
Adrian Prantl
f01f80ce6c [lldb] Extend frame recognizers to hide frames from backtraces (#104523)
Compilers and language runtimes often use helper functions that are
fundamentally uninteresting when debugging anything but the
compiler/runtime itself. This patch introduces a user-extensible
mechanism that allows for these frames to be hidden from backtraces and
automatically skipped over when navigating the stack with `up` and
`down`.

This does not affect the numbering of frames, so `f <N>` will still
provide access to the hidden frames. The `bt` output will also print a
hint that frames have been hidden.

My primary motivation for this feature is to hide thunks in the Swift
programming language, but I'm including an example recognizer for
`std::function::operator()` that I wished for myself many times while
debugging LLDB.

rdar://126629381


Example output. (Yes, my proof-of-concept recognizer could hide even
more frames if we had a method that returned the function name without
the return type or I used something that isn't based off regex, but it's
really only meant as an example).

before:
```
(lldb) thread backtrace --filtered=false
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
    frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
    frame #3: 0x0000000100003968 a.out`std::__1::__function::__alloc_func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff280, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:171:12
    frame #4: 0x00000001000026bc a.out`std::__1::__function::__func<int (*)(int, int), std::__1::allocator<int (*)(int, int)>, int (int, int)>::operator()(this=0x000000016fdff278, __arg=0x000000016fdff224, __arg=0x000000016fdff220) at function.h:313:10
    frame #5: 0x0000000100003c38 a.out`std::__1::__function::__value_func<int (int, int)>::operator()[abi:se200000](this=0x000000016fdff278, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) const at function.h:430:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
    frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
(lldb) 
```

after

```
(lldb) bt
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = breakpoint 1.1
  * frame #0: 0x0000000100001f04 a.out`foo(x=1, y=1) at main.cpp:4:10
    frame #1: 0x0000000100003a00 a.out`decltype(std::declval<int (*&)(int, int)>()(std::declval<int>(), std::declval<int>())) std::__1::__invoke[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__f=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:149:25
    frame #2: 0x000000010000399c a.out`int std::__1::__invoke_void_return_wrapper<int, false>::__call[abi:se200000]<int (*&)(int, int), int, int>(__args=0x000000016fdff280, __args=0x000000016fdff224, __args=0x000000016fdff220) at invoke.h:216:12
    frame #6: 0x0000000100002038 a.out`std::__1::function<int (int, int)>::operator()(this= Function = foo(int, int) , __arg=1, __arg=1) const at function.h:989:10
    frame #7: 0x0000000100001f64 a.out`main(argc=1, argv=0x000000016fdff4f8) at main.cpp:9:10
    frame #8: 0x0000000183cdf154 dyld`start + 2476
Note: Some frames were hidden by frame recognizers
```
2024-08-20 16:01:22 -07:00
Dhruv Srivastava
b804516dc5 [lldb][AIX] 1. Avoid namespace collision on other platforms (#104679)
This PR is in reference to porting LLDB on AIX.

Link to discussions on llvm discourse and github:
1.  https://discourse.llvm.org/t/port-lldb-to-ibm-aix/80640
2.  #101657 

The complete changes for porting are present in this draft PR:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102601

The changes on this PR are intended to avoid namespace collision for
certain typedefs between lldb and other platforms:
1. tid_t --> lldb::tid_t
2. offset_t --> lldb::offset_t
2024-08-20 10:19:32 +01:00
Jacob Lalonde
572943e790 [LLDB] Reapply #100443 SBSaveCore Thread list (#104497)
Reapply #100443 and #101770. These were originally reverted due to a
test failure and an MSAN failure. I changed the test attribute to
restrict to x86 (following the other existing tests). I could not
reproduce the test or the MSAN failure and no repo steps were provided.
2024-08-15 16:29:59 -07:00
Alex Langford
101cf540e6 [lldb] Move definition of SBSaveCoreOptions dtor out of header (#102539)
This class is technically not usable in its current state. When you use
it in a simple C++ project, your compiler will complain about an
incomplete definition of SaveCoreOptions. Normally this isn't a problem,
other classes in the SBAPI do this. The difference is that
SBSaveCoreOptions has a default destructor in the header, so the
compiler will attempt to generate the code for the destructor with an
incomplete definition of the impl type.

All methods for every class, including constructors and destructors,
must have a separate implementation not in a header.
2024-08-09 12:50:42 -07:00
Med Ismail Bennani
585523750e [lldb/API] Fix SBStructuredData support any JSON type (#101929)
This patch loosen the parsing requirement to allow parsing not only
JSON dictionaries but also valid JSON type (integer, float, string,
bool, array, null).

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
2024-08-07 11:21:27 -07:00
Kevin Frei
e77ac42bcc [lldb][debuginfod] Fix the DebugInfoD PR that caused issues when working with stripped binaries (#99362)
@walter-erquinigo found the the [PR with testing and a fix for
DebugInfoD](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98344) caused an
issue when working with stripped binaries.

The issue is that when you're working with split-dwarf, there are *3*
possible files: The stripped binary the user is debugging, the
"only-keep-debug" *or* unstripped binary, plus the `.dwp` file. The
debuginfod plugin should provide the unstripped/OKD binary. However, if
the debuginfod plugin fails, the default symbol locator plugin will just
return the stripped binary, which doesn't help. So, to address that, the
SymbolVendorELF code checks to see if the SymbolLocator's
ExecutableObjectFile request returned the same file, and bails if that's
the case. You can see the specific diff as the second commit in the PR.

I'm investigating adding a test: I can't quite get a simple repro, and
I'm unwilling to make any additional changes to Makefile.rules to this
diff, for Pavlovian reasons.
2024-08-06 11:06:04 -07:00
jeffreytan81
f838fa820f New ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout to resolve potential deadlock in single thread stepping (#90930)
This PR introduces a new `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` that will be
used to address potential deadlock during single-thread stepping.

While debugging a target with a non-trivial number of threads (around
5000 threads in one example target), we noticed that a simple step over
can take as long as 10 seconds. Enabling single-thread stepping mode
significantly reduces the stepping time to around 3 seconds. However,
this can introduce deadlock if we try to step over a method that depends
on other threads to release a lock.

To address this issue, we introduce a new
`ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` that can be controlled by the
`target.process.thread.single-thread-plan-timeout` setting during
single-thread stepping mode. The concept involves counting the elapsed
time since the last internal stop to detect overall stepping progress.
Once a timeout occurs, we assume the target is not making progress due
to a potential deadlock, as mentioned above. We then send a new async
interrupt, resume all threads, and `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout`
completes its task.

To support this design, the major changes made in this PR are:
1. `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout` is popped during every internal stop
and reset (re-pushed) to the top of the stack (as a leaf node) during
resume. This is achieved by always returning `true` from
`ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout::DoPlanExplainsStop()` and
`ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout::MischiefManaged()`.
2. A new thread-specific async interrupt stop is introduced, which can
be detected/consumed by `ThreadPlanSingleThreadTimeout`.
3. The clearing of branch breakpoints in the range thread plan has been
moved from `DoPlanExplainsStop()` to `ShouldStop()`, as it is not
guaranteed that it will be called.

The detailed design is discussed in the RFC below:

[https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/improve-single-thread-stepping/74599)

---------

Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
2024-08-05 17:26:39 -07:00
Med Ismail Bennani
039cfe812c [lldb/Target] Rename ThreadPlanPython into ScriptedThreadPlan (#101931)
Following 9a9ec228cd, since the ThreadPlanPython class started making
use of the Scripted Interface instead of calling directly into the
python methods, this class can work with other scripting languages (as
long as someone add the interfact for that language ;p).

So it doesn't make sense anymore for it to keep this name and also we
should avoid having language specific related classes outside the plugin
directory.

This patch renames the internal class from `ThreadPlanPython` to
`ScriptedThreadPlan` as its advertised externally, and also updates the
various log messages.

This should hopefully make the codebase more coherent.

Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <ismail@bennani.ma>
2024-08-05 10:43:42 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
accf5c9bb3 Revert "[LLDB][SBSaveCore] Implement a selectable threadlist for Core… (#102018)
… Options.  (#100443)"

This reverts commit 3e4af61633.

@adrian-prantl FYI

Reverts #100443
2024-08-05 10:17:25 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
3e4af61633 [LLDB][SBSaveCore] Implement a selectable threadlist for Core Options. (#100443)
In #98403 I enabled the SBSaveCoreOptions object, which allows users via
the scripting API to define what they want saved into their core file.
As the first option I've added a threadlist, so users can scan and
identify which threads and corresponding stacks they want to save.

In order to support this, I had to add a new method to `Process.h` on
how we identify which threads are to be saved, and I had to change the
book keeping in minidump to ensure we don't double save the stacks.

Important to @jasonmolenda I also changed the MachO coredump to accept
these new APIs.
2024-08-02 13:35:05 -07:00
Jacob Lalonde
4120570dc4 [LLDB][SaveCore] Add SBSaveCoreOptions Object, and SBProcess::SaveCore() overload (#98403)
This PR adds `SBSaveCoreOptions`, which is a container class for options
when LLDB is taking coredumps. For this first iteration this container
just keeps parity with the extant API of `file, style, plugin`. In the
future this options object can be extended to allow users to take a
subset of their core dumps.
2024-07-18 17:10:15 -07:00
walter erquinigo
27b2f4f861 [LLDB] Revert #98351 and #98344
This reverts commit 2fa1220a37.
This reverts commit b9496a74eb.

The patch #98344 causes a crash in LLDB when parsing some files like `numpy.libs/libgfortran-daac5196.so.5.0.0` on graviton (you can download it in https://drive.google.com/file/d/12ygLjJwWpzdYsrzBPp1JGiFHxcgM0-XY/view?usp=drive_link if you want to troubleshoot yourself).

The assert that is hit is the following:

```
llvm-project/lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/ELF/ObjectFileELF.cpp:2452: std::pair<unsigned int, std::map<long unsigned int, lldb_private::AddressClass> > ObjectFileELF::ParseSymbolTable(lldb_private::Symtab*, lldb::user_id_t, lldb_private::Section*): Assertion `strtab->GetObjectFile() == this' failed.
[383588:383636:20240716,025305.572639:ERROR crashpad_client_linux.cc:780] Crashpad isn't enabled
```

This object file doesn't have apparently a strings table but LLDB still tries to process it due to the code that is being reverted.
2024-07-15 23:00:17 -04:00
Vincent Belliard
82af55983d [API] add GetSyntheticValue (#95959)
Adds GetSyntheticValue to the API on top of GetNonSyntheticValue.

---------

Co-authored-by: Vincent Belliard <v-bulle@github.com>
2024-07-15 17:28:56 +02:00
Walter Erquinigo
541f22ee36 [lldb-dap] Support throw and catch exception breakpoints for dynamica… (#97871)
…lly registered languages

First of all, this is done to support exceptions for the Mojo language,
but it's done in a way that will benefit any other plugin language.

1. I added a new lldb-dap CLI argument (not DAP field) called
`pre-init-commands`. These commands are executed before DAP
initialization. The other `init-commands` are executed after DAP
initialization. It's worth mentioning that the debug adapter returns to
VSCode the list of supported exception breakpoints during DAP
initialization, which means that I need to register the Mojo plugin
before that initialization step, hence the need for `pre-init-commands`.
In general, language plugins should be registered in that step, as they
affect the capabilities of the debugger.
2. I added a set of APIs for lldb-dap to query information of each
language related to exception breakpoints. E.g. whether a language
supports throw or catch breakpoints, how the throw keyword is called in
each particular language, etc.
3. I'm realizing that the Swift support for exception breakpoints in
lldb-dap should have been implemented in this way, instead of hardcoding
it.
2024-07-10 19:05:38 -04:00
Kevin Frei
b9496a74eb [lldb] DebugInfoD tests & fixes (but with dwp testing disabled) (#98344)
This is all the tests and fixes I've had percolating since my first
attempt at this in January. After 6 months of trying, I've given up on
adding the ability to test DWP files in LLDB API tests. I've left both
the tests (disabled) and the changes to Makefile.rules in place, in the
hopes that someone who can configure the build bots will be able to
enable the tests once a non-borked dwp tool is widely available.

Other than disabling the DWP tests, this continues to be the same diff
that I've tried to land and
[not](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90622)
[revert](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87676)
[five](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86812)
[times](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85693)
[before](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96802). There are a
couple of fixes that the testing exposed, and I've abandoned the DWP
tests because I want to get those fixes finally upstreamed, as without
them DebugInfoD is less useful.
2024-07-10 09:28:22 -07:00
Kevin Frei
b2fd1ebc35 Revert "[LLDB] DebugInfoD tests: attempt to fix Fuchsia build" (#98101)
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#96802

Attempt #5 fails. It's been 6 months. I despise Makefile.rules and have
no ability to even *detect* these failures without _landing_ a diff. In
the mean time, we have no testing for DWP files at all (and a regression
that was introduced, that I fix with this diff) so I'm going to just
remove some of the tests and try to land it again, but with less testing
I guess.
2024-07-08 17:59:00 -07:00
Kevin Frei
2a7abb04e2 [LLDB] DebugInfoD tests: attempt to fix Fuchsia build (#96802)
This is the same diff I've put up at many times before. I've been trying
to add some brand new functionality to the LLDB test infrastucture
(create split-dwarf files!), and we all know that no good deed goes
unpunished. The last attempt was reverted because it didn't work on the
Fuchsia build.

There are no code differences between this and
[the](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90622)
[previous](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87676)
[four](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86812)
[diffs](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85693) landed &
reverted (due to testing infra failures). The only change in this one is
the way `dwp` is being identified in `Makefile.rules`.

Thanks to @petrhosek for helping me figure out how the fuchsia builders
are configured. I now prefer to use llvm-dwp and fall back to gnu's dwp
if the former isn't found. Hopefully this will work everywhere it needs
to.
2024-07-08 16:44:16 -07:00
Pavel Labath
b590e9a5ae [lldb] Remove Listener::SetShadow (#97555)
It's not used since https://reviews.llvm.org/D157556.
2024-07-08 12:06:32 +02:00
jimingham
845dee36ba SBThread::StepInstruction shouldn't discard other plans (#97493)
This was just a typo, none of the external execution control functions
should discard other plans. In particular, it means if you stop in a
hand-called function and step an instruction, the function call thread
plan gets unshipped, popping all the function call frames.

I also added a test that asserts the correct behavior. I tested all the
stepping operations even though only StepInstruction was wrong.
2024-07-03 10:45:20 -07:00
Vy Nguyen
e951bd0f51 Reapply PR/87550 (again) (#95571)
New fixes:
- properly init the `std::optional<std::vector>` to an empty vector as
opposed to `{}` (which was effectively `std::nullopt`).

---------

Co-authored-by: Vy Nguyen <oontvoo@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-06-25 12:01:17 -04:00
Miro Bucko
0d4da0df16 [lldb][API] Add Find(Ranges)InMemory() to Process SB API (#96569)
This is a second attempt to land #95007

Test Plan:
llvm-lit
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/python_api/find_in_memory/TestFindInMemory.py
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/python_api/find_in_memory/TestFindRangesInMemory.py

Reviewers: clayborg

Tasks: lldb
2024-06-24 18:51:12 -04:00
Chelsea Cassanova
a32b7199f0 Revert commits that add TestFind(Ranges)InMemory.py (#96560)
Reverting to unblock macOS buildbots which are currently failing on
these tests.
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/as-lldb-cmake/6377/
2024-06-24 15:12:49 -07:00
Miro Bucko
10bd5ad0a1 [lldb][API] Add Find(Ranges)InMemory() to Process SB API (#95007)
Test Plan:
llvm-lit
llvm-project/lldb/test/API/python_api/find_in_memory/TestFindInMemory.py

llvm-project/lldb/test/API/python_api/find_in_memory/TestFindRangesInMemory.py

Reviewers: clayborg

Tasks: lldb
2024-06-24 11:06:20 -04:00
Miro Bucko
a083e50f53 [lldb] Fix SBAddressRange validation checks. (#95997) 2024-06-21 11:24:48 -04:00