Summary:
Instead of having SymbolVendor coordinate Symtab construction between
Symbol and Object files, make the SymbolVendor function a passthrough,
and put all of the logic into the SymbolFile.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arichardson, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65208
llvm-svn: 367086
Summary:
Similarly to the compile unit lists, the list of types can also be
managed by the symbol file itself.
Since the only purpose of this list seems to be to maintain an owning
reference to all the types a symbol file has created (items are only
ever added to the list, never retrieved), I remove the passthrough
functions in SymbolVendor and Module. I also tighten the interface of
the function (return a reference instead of a pointer, make it protected
instead of public).
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65135
llvm-svn: 366994
Summary:
I messed up the logic for this. Fixing with some improvements suggested
by Pavel.
Reviewers: labath, jdoerfert
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65165
llvm-svn: 366950
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
A side effect of this commit was that it exchanged the order of types
and compile units in the output of SymbolVendor::Dump. A couple of PDB
tests dependened on that to assert the links between the two.
While it wouldn't be too hard to update the tests, the change of
ordering was not something I intended to do with that patch, and is easy
to restore the original order, so I do just that.
llvm-svn: 366798
Summary:
SymbolFile classes are responsible for creating CompileUnit instances
and they already need to have a notion of the id<->CompileUnit mapping
(because of APIs like ParseCompileUnitAtIndex). However, the
SymbolVendor has remained as the thing responsible for caching created
units (which the SymbolFiles were calling via convoluted constructs like
"m_obj_file->GetModule()->GetSymbolVendor()->SetCompileUnitAtIndex(...)").
This patch moves the responsibility of caching the units into the
SymbolFile class. It does this by moving the implementation of
SymbolVendor::{GetNumCompileUnits,GetCompileUnitAtIndex} into the
equivalent SymbolFile functions. The SymbolVendor functions become just
a passthrough much like the rest of SymbolVendor.
The original implementations of SymbolFile::GetNumCompileUnits is moved
to "CalculateNumCompileUnits", and are made protected, as the "Get"
function is the external api of the class.
SymbolFile::ParseCompileUnitAtIndex is made protected for the same
reason.
This is the first step in removing the SymbolVendor indirection, as
proposed in
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-June/015071.html>. After
removing all interesting logic from the SymbolVendor class, I'll proceed
with removing the indirection itself.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65089
llvm-svn: 366791
Summary:
When trying to ascertain what language a variable belongs to, just
checking the compilation unit is often not enough. In r364845 I added a way to
check for a variable's language type, but didn't put it in Variable itself.
Let's go ahead and put it in Variable.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64042
llvm-svn: 366733
Summary:
Add __kernel_rt_sigreturn to the list of trap handlers for Linux (it's
used as such on aarch64 at least), and __restore_rt as well (used on
x86_64).
Skip decrement-and-recompute for trap handlers in
InitializeNonZerothFrame, as signal dispatch may point the child frame's
return address to the start of the return trampoline.
Parse the 'S' flag for signal handlers from eh_frame augmentation, and
propagate it to the unwind plan.
Reviewers: labath, jankratochvil, compnerd, jfb, jasonmolenda
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: clayborg, MaskRay, wuzish, nemanjai, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63667
llvm-svn: 366580
In ClangASTContext::CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo a TemplateArgumentList is allocated on the stack but is treated as if it is persistent in subsequent calls. When we exit the function func_decl will still point to the stack allocated memory. We will use TemplateArgumentList::CreateCopy instead which will allocate memory out of the DeclContext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64777
llvm-svn: 366365
Summary:
Following up to my CPPLanguageRuntime change, I'm moving
ObjCLanguageRuntime into a plugin as well.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, compnerd, jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, arphaman, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64763
llvm-svn: 366148
Summary:
If we call this function with a non-namespace as a second argument (and a nullptr name), we currently
only get a nullptr as a return when we hit the "Bad!!!" code path. This patch just adds an assert as this
seems to be a programming error in the calling code.
Reviewers: shafik
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57880
llvm-svn: 365157
Summary:
Following up on the plan I outlined in D63622, we can remove the
dependence on clang in all the places where we only want to find the
types from the DeclVendor. This means that currently DeclVendor depends
on clang, but centralizing the dependency makes it easier to refactor
cleanly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63853
llvm-svn: 364962
Summary:
Instead of falling back to ObjCLanguageRuntime, we should be falling
back to every loaded language runtime. This makes ValueObject more
language agnostic.
Reviewers: labath, compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63240
llvm-svn: 364845
+ dlsym the two functions we need from there at runtime.
I'm not maintaining a negative cache if DebugSymbols is absent, so
we'll try to dlopen() it on every call to
LocateMacOSXFilesUsingDebugSymbols but this file is only built on
mac and iOS type systems, so there's a slight perf impact running
lldb on an iOS type system.
I store the function pointer results in two global variables without
any locking; two threads calling into LocateMacOSXFilesUsingDebugSymbols
for the first time will both try to set these fptrs, but they'll be
setting them to the same value, so I'm not too worried.
I didn't see where in the cmake build configurations we link against
DebugSymbols, but I removed the dependency from the xcode project
file.
<rdar://problem/49458356>
llvm-svn: 364243
Summary:
this revision adds Lexing, Parsing and Basic Semantic for the consteval specifier as specified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1073r3.html
with this patch, the consteval specifier is treated as constexpr but can only be applied to function declaration.
Changes:
- add the consteval keyword.
- add parsing of consteval specifier for normal declarations and lambdas expressions.
- add the whether a declaration is constexpr is now represented by and enum everywhere except for variable because they can't be consteval.
- adapt diagnostic about constexpr to print constexpr or consteval depending on the case.
- add tests for basic semantic.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, efriedma, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61790
llvm-svn: 363362
Summary:
The motivation for this was me wanting to make the validity of dwarf
DIERefs explicit (via llvm::Optional<DIERef>). This meant that the class
would no longer have a default constructor. As the DIERef was being
stored in a UniqueCStringMap, this meant that this container (like all
standard containers) needed to work with non-default-constructible types
too.
This part is achieved by removing the default constructors for the map
entry types, and providing appropriate comparison overloads so that we
can search for map entries without constructing a dummy entry. While
doing that, I took the opportunity to modernize the code, and add some
tests. Functions that were completely unused are deleted.
This required also some changes in the Symtab code, as it was default
constructing map entries, which was not impossible even though its
value type was default-constructible. Technically, these changes could
be avoided with some SFINAE on the entry type, but I felt that the code
is cleaner this way anyway.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, sgraenitz
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63268
llvm-svn: 363357
Summary:
In an effort to make Process more language agnostic, I removed
GetCPPLanguageRuntime from Process. I'm following up now with an equivalent
change for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63052
llvm-svn: 362981
There's no reason for anyone to modify a list from outside of a symbol
file (as that would break a lot of invariants that symbol files depend
on).
Make the function return a const FileSpecList and fix up a couple of
places that were needlessly binding non-const references to the result
of this function.
llvm-svn: 362069
Like many of our DWARF classes, the DWARFExpression can be initialized
in several ways. One such way was through a constructor that takes just
the compile unit. This constructor is used to initialize both empty
DWARFExpressions, and DWARFExpression that will be populated later.
To make the distinction more clear, I changed the constructor to a
default constructor and updated its call sites. Where the
DWARFExpression was being populated later, I replaced that with a call
to the copy assignment constructor.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62425
llvm-svn: 361849
The two sections usually contain the same information, and we rarely
have both kinds of entries for a single function. However, in theory the
debug_frame plan can be more complete, whereas eh_frame is only required
to be correct at places where exceptions can be thrown.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62374
llvm-svn: 361758
Summary:
Previous patch (r360409) introduced the "symbol file unwind plan"
concept, but that plan wasn't used for unwinding yet. With this patch,
we start to consider the new plan as a possible strategy for both
synchronous and asynchronous unwinding. I also add a test that asserts
that unwinding via breakpad STACK CFI info works end-to-end.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits, amccarth, markmentovai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61853
llvm-svn: 361618
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
Summary:
Log the AST of the TU associated with LLDB's `expr` command, once a declaration
is completed
Reviewers: shafik
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62061
llvm-svn: 361362
Summary:
This is the final phase of the refactoring towards using llvm::Expected
and llvm::Error in the ASTImporter API.
This involves the following:
- remove old Import functions which returned with a pointer,
- use the Import_New functions (which return with Err or Expected) everywhere
and handle their return value
- rename Import_New functions to Import
This affects both Clang and LLDB.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor, aprantl, a_sidorin, balazske, a.sidorin
Subscribers: rnkovacs, dkrupp, Szelethus, gamesh411, cfe-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #clang, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61438
llvm-svn: 360760
Summary:
some unwind formats are specific to a single symbol file and so it does
not make sense for their parsing code live in the general Symbol library
(as is the case with eh_frame for instance). This is the case for the
unwind information in breakpad files, but the same will probably be true
for PDB unwind info (once we are able to parse that).
This patch adds the ability to fetch an unwind plan provided by a symbol
file plugin, as discussed in the RFC at
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-February/014703.html>.
I've kept the set of changes to a minimum, as there is no way to test
them until we have a symbol file which implements this API -- that is
comming in a follow-up patch, which will also implicitly test this
change.
The interesting part here is the introduction of the
"RegisterInfoResolver" interface. The reason for this is that breakpad
needs to be able to resolve register names (which are present as strings
in the file) into register enums so that it can construct the unwind
plan. This is normally done via the RegisterContext class, handing this
over to the SymbolFile plugin would mean that it has full access to the
debugged process, which is not something we want it to have. So instead,
I create a facade, which only provides the ability to query register
names, and hide the RegisterContext behind the facade.
Also note that this only adds the ability to dump the unwind plan
created by the symbol file plugin -- the plan is not used for unwinding
yet -- this will be added in a third patch, which will add additional
tests which makes sure the unwinding works as a whole.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg
Subscribers: markmentovai, amccarth, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61732
llvm-svn: 360409
Summary:
This is necessary to support parsing expressions like ".cfa -16 + ^", as
that format is used in breakpad STACK CFI expressions.
Since the PDB expressions use the same parser, this change will affect
them too, but I don't believe that should be a problem in practice. If
PDBs do contain the negative values, it's very likely that they are
intended to be parsed the same way, and if they don't, then it doesn't
matter.
In case that we do ever need to handle this differently, we can always
make the parser behavior customizable, or just use a different parser.
To make sure that the integer size is big enough for everyone, I switch
from using a (unsigned) 32-bit integer to a 64-bit (signed) one.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg, aleksandr.urakov
Subscribers: markmentovai, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61311
llvm-svn: 360166
Summary:
r360109 added a new enum case, causing lldb build to fail with several errors like:
lldb/source/Symbol/ClangASTContext.cpp:4342:11: error: enumeration value 'MacroQualified' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
This adds the missing switch cases.
I'm not an lldb maintainer and just used my best judgement that it's probably expected that we break in these cases. Feel free to ping / revert / fix this change if this behavior is not appropriate.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61640
llvm-svn: 360146
Checking this in for Antonio Afonso:
This diff changes the function LineEntry::GetSameLineContiguousAddressRange so that it also includes function calls that were inlined at the same line of code.
My motivation is to decrease the step over time of lines that heavly rely on inlined functions. I have multiple examples in the code base I work that makes a step over stop 20 or mote times internally. This can easly had up to step overs that take >500ms which I was able to lower to 25ms with this new strategy.
The reason the current code is not extending the address range beyond an inlined function is because when we resolve the symbol at the next address of the line entry we will get the entry line corresponding to where the original code for the inline function lives, making us barely extend the range. This then will end up on a step over having to stop multiple times everytime there's an inlined function.
To check if the range is an inlined function at that line I also get the block associated with the next address and check if there is a parent block with a call site at the line we're trying to extend.
To check this I created a new function in Block called GetContainingInlinedBlockWithCallSite that does exactly that. I also added a new function to Declaration for convinence of checking file/line named CompareFileAndLine.
To avoid potential issues when extending an address range I added an Extend function that extends the range by the AddressRange given as an argument. This function returns true to indicate sucess when the rage was agumented, false otherwise (e.g.: the ranges are not connected). The reason I do is to make sure that we're not just blindly extending complete_line_range by whatever GetByteSize() we got. If for some reason the ranges are not connected or overlap, or even 0, this could be an issue.
I also added a unit tests for this change and include the instructions on the test itself on how to generate the yaml file I use for testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61292
llvm-svn: 360071
This caused Clang to start erroring on the following:
struct S {
template <typename = int> explicit S();
};
struct T : S {};
struct U : T {
U();
};
U::U() {}
$ clang -c /tmp/x.cc
/tmp/x.cc:10:4: error: call to implicitly-deleted default constructor of 'T'
U::U() {}
^
/tmp/x.cc:5:12: note: default constructor of 'T' is implicitly deleted
because base class 'S' has no default constructor
struct T : S {};
^
1 error generated.
See discussion on the cfe-commits email thread.
This also reverts the follow-ups r359966 and r359968.
> this patch adds support for the explicit bool specifier.
>
> Changes:
> - The parsing for the explicit(bool) specifier was added in ParseDecl.cpp.
> - The storage of the explicit specifier was changed. the explicit specifier was stored as a boolean value in the FunctionDeclBitfields and in the DeclSpec class. now it is stored as a PointerIntPair<Expr*, 2> with a flag and a potential expression in CXXConstructorDecl, CXXDeductionGuideDecl, CXXConversionDecl and in the DeclSpec class.
> - Following the AST change, Serialization, ASTMatchers, ASTComparator and ASTPrinter were adapted.
> - Template instantiation was adapted to instantiate the potential expressions of the explicit(bool) specifier When instantiating their associated declaration.
> - The Add*Candidate functions were adapted, they now take a Boolean indicating if the context allowing explicit constructor or conversion function and this boolean is used to remove invalid overloads that required template instantiation to be detected.
> - Test for Semantic and Serialization were added.
>
> This patch is not yet complete. I still need to check that interaction with CTAD and deduction guides is correct. and add more tests for AST operations. But I wanted first feedback.
> Perhaps this patch should be spited in smaller patches, but making each patch testable as a standalone may be tricky.
>
> Patch by Tyker
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60934
llvm-svn: 360024
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
by respecting the "artificial" attribute on variables. Function
arguments that are artificial and useful to end-users are being
whitelisted by the language runtime.
<rdar://problem/45322477>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61451
llvm-svn: 359841
Summary:
I think there universal agreement that Minion isn't the best name for this class. This patch renames the class
to ASTImporterDelegate to better reflect it's goal of monitoring and extending the ASTImporter.
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, martong, a.sidorin, davide
Reviewed By: aprantl, shafik, davide
Subscribers: rnkovacs, davide, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61299
llvm-svn: 359777
