This allows us to peek through BITCASTs, attempt to simplify the source operand, and then bitcast back.
This reapplies rL367091 which was reverted at rL367118 - we were inconsistently peeking through the bitcasts to the source value.
Fixes PR42777
llvm-svn: 367174
If anything called the recursive isKnownNeverNaN/computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits/SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits with an incorrect depth then we could continue to recurse if we'd already exceeded the depth limit.
This replaces the limit check (Depth == 6) with a (Depth >= 6) to make sure that we don't circumvent it.
This causes a couple of regressions as a mixture of calls (SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits + combineX86ShufflesRecursively) were calling with depths that were already over the limit. I've fixed SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to not do this. combineX86ShufflesRecursively is trickier as we get a lot of regressions if we reduce its own limit from 8 to 6 (it also starts at Depth == 1 instead of Depth == 0 like the others....) - I'll see what I can do in future patches.
llvm-svn: 367171
We're getting reports of massive compile time increases because SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits was losing track of the depth and not earlying-out. No repro yet, but consider this a pre-emptive commit.
llvm-svn: 367169
Eventually all of these will be moved over, but we create nodes in GetDemandedBits recursion at the moment which causes regressions when we try to remove them all.
llvm-svn: 367092
Summary:
This was originally reported in D62818.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oPH
InstCombine does the opposite fold, in hope that `C l>>/<< Y` expression
will be hoisted out of a loop if `Y` is invariant and `X` is not.
But as it is seen from the diffs here, if it didn't get hoisted,
the produced assembly is almost universally worse.
Much like with my recent "hoist add/sub by/from const" patches,
we should get almost universal win if we hoist constant,
there is almost always an "and/test by imm" instruction,
but "shift of imm" not so much, so we may avoid having to
materialize the immediate, and thus need one less register.
And since we now shift not by constant, but by something else,
the live-range of that something else may reduce.
Special care needs to be applied not to disturb x86 `BT` / hexagon `tstbit`
instruction pattern. And to not get into endless combine loop.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, wuzish, xbolva00, nikic, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, kristof.beyls, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62871
llvm-svn: 366955
This patch adds support for recognizing cases where a larger vector type is being used to reduce just the elements in the lower subvector:
e.g. <8 x i32> reduction pattern in a <16 x i32> vector:
<4,5,6,7,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
<2,3,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
<1,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u,u>
matchBinOpReduction returns the lower extracted subvector in such cases, assuming isExtractSubvectorCheap accepts the extraction.
I've only enabled it for X86 reduction sums so far. I intend to enable it for the bitop/minmax cases in future patches, and eventually I think its worth turning it on all the time. This is mainly just a case of ensuring calls to matchBinOpReduction don't make assumptions on the vector width based on the original vector extraction.
Fixes the x86 partial reduction sum cases in PR33758 and PR42023.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65047
llvm-svn: 366933
If we are already using the same chain for the old/new memory ops then just return.
Fixes PR42727 which had getLoad() reusing an existing node.
llvm-svn: 366922
If all the demanded elts are from one operand and are inline, then we can use the operand directly.
The changes are mainly from SSE41 targets which has blendvpd but not cmpgtq, allowing the v2i64 comparison to be simplified as we only need the signbit from alternate v4i32 elements.
llvm-svn: 366817
This patch introduces the DAG version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, which attempts to peek through ops (mainly and/or/xor so far) that don't contribute to the demandedbits/elts of a node - which means we can do this even in cases where we have multiple uses of an op, which normally requires us to demanded all bits/elts. The intention is to remove a similar instruction - SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits - once SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits has matured.
The InstCombine version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits can constant fold which I haven't added here yet, and so far I've only wired this up to some basic binops (and/or/xor/add/sub/mul) to demonstrate its use.
We do see a couple of regressions that need to be addressed:
AMDGPU unsigned dot product codegen retains an AND mask (for ZERO_EXTEND) that it previously removed (but otherwise the dotproduct codegen is a lot better).
X86/AVX2 has poor handling of vector ANY_EXTEND/ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG - it prematurely gets converted to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
The code owners have confirmed its ok for these cases to fixed up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63281
llvm-svn: 366799
The function was calling getNode() on an SDValue to return and the
caller turned the result back into a SDValue. So just return the
original SDValue to avoid this.
llvm-svn: 366779
We were silently using the ABI alignment for all of the stores generated for deopt and gc values. We'd gotten the alignment of the stack slot itself properly reduced (via MachineFrameInfo's clamping), but having the MMO on the store incorrect was enough for us to generate an aligned store to a unaligned location.
The simplest fix would have been to just pass the alignment to the helper function, but once we do that, the helper function doesn't really help. So, inline it and directly call the MMO version of DAG.getStore with a properly constructed MMO.
Note that there's a separate performance possibility here. Even if we *can* realign stacks, we probably don't *want to* if all of the stores are in slowpaths. But that's a later patch, if at all. :)
llvm-svn: 366765
ARM has code to recognise uses of the "returned" function parameter
attribute which guarantee that the value passed to the function in r0
will be returned in r0 unmodified. IPRA replaces the regmask on call
instructions, so needs to be told about this to avoid reverting the
optimisation.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64986
llvm-svn: 366669
Summary:
Four things here:
1. Generalize the fold to handle non-splat divisors. Reasonably trivial.
2. Unban power-of-two divisors. I don't see any reason why they should
be illegal.
* There is no ban in Hacker's Delight
* I think the ban came from the same bug that caused the miscompile
in the base patch - in `floor((2^W - 1) / D)` we were dividing by
`D0` instead of `D`, and we **were** ensuring that `D0` is not `1`,
which made sense.
3. Unban `1` divisors. I no longer believe Hacker's Delight actually says
that the fold is invalid for `D = 0`. Further considerations:
* We know that
* `(X u% 1) == 0` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `(X u% 1) != 0` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* Also, we know that
* `X u<= -1` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `X u> -1` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* https://godbolt.org/z/7jnZJXhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/oF6p
* We know will end up with the following:
`(setule/setugt (rotr (mul N, P), K), Q)`
* Therefore, for given new DAG nodes and comparison predicates
(`ule`/`ugt`), we will still produce the correct answer if:
`Q` is a all-ones constant; and both `P` and `K` are *anything*
other than `undef`.
* The fold will indeed produce `Q = all-ones`.
4. Try to re-splat the `P` and `K` vectors - we don't care about
their values for the lanes where divisor was `1`.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hermord, craig.topper, spatel, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63963
llvm-svn: 366637
This was handled previously for arguments split due to not fitting in
an MVT. This was dropping the register for argument registers split
due to TLI::getRegisterTypeForCallingConv.
llvm-svn: 366574
Implement IR intrinsics for stack tagging. Generated code is very
unoptimized for now.
Two special intrinsics, llvm.aarch64.irg.sp and llvm.aarch64.tagp are
used to implement a tagged stack frame pointer in a virtual register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64172
llvm-svn: 366360
Summary:
As per title. DAGCombiner only mathes the special case where b = 0, this patches extends the pattern to match any value of b.
Depends on D57302
Reviewers: hfinkel, RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59208
llvm-svn: 366214
We already split extract_subvector(binop(insert_subvector(v,x),insert_subvector(w,y))) -> binop(x,y).
This patch adds support for extract_subvector(binop(concat_vectors(),concat_vectors())) cases as well.
In particular this means we don't have to wait for X86 lowering to convert concat_vectors to insert_subvector chains, which helps avoid some cases where demandedelts/combine calls occur too late to split large vector ops.
The fast-isel-store.ll load folding regression is annoying but I don't think is that critical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63653
llvm-svn: 365785
If we have:
R = sub X, Y
P = cmp Y, X
...then flipping the operands in the compare instruction can allow using a subtract that sets compare flags.
Motivated by diffs in D58875 - not sure if this changes anything there,
but this seems like a good thing independent of that.
There's a more involved version of this transform already in IR (in instcombine
although that seems misplaced to me) - see "swapMayExposeCSEOpportunities()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63958
llvm-svn: 365711
Summary: Unsafe does not map well alone for each of these three cases as it is missing NoNan context when accessed directly with clang. I have migrated the fold guards to reflect the expectations of handing nan and zero contexts directly (NoNan, NSZ) and some tests with it. Unsafe does include NSZ, however there is already precedent for using the target option directly to reflect that context.
Reviewers: spatel, wristow, hfinkel, craig.topper, arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: michele.scandale, wdng, javed.absar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64450
llvm-svn: 365679
Basically the problem is that X86 doesn't set the Fast flag from
allowsMemoryAccess on certain CPUs due to slow unaligned memory
subtarget features. This prevents bitcasts from being folded into
loads and stores. But all vector loads and stores of the same width
are the same cost on X86.
This patch merges the allowsMemoryAccess call into isLoadBitCastBeneficial to allow X86 to skip it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64295
llvm-svn: 365549
This makes the functions in Loads.h require a type to be specified
independently of the pointer Value so that when pointers have no structure
other than address-space, it can still do its job.
Most callers had an obvious memory operation handy to provide this type, but a
SROA and ArgumentPromotion were doing more complicated analysis. They get
updated to merge the properties of the various instructions they were
considering.
llvm-svn: 365468
DAGTypeLegalizer and SelectionDAGLegalize has helper
functions wrapping the call to TLI.getSetCCResultType(...).
Use those helpers in more places.
llvm-svn: 365456
Summary:
Make sure we use SETGE instead of SETGT when checking
if the sign bit is zero at SMULFIXSAT expansion.
The faulty expansion occured when doing "expand" of
SMULFIXSAT and the scale was exactly matching the
size of the smaller type. For example doing
i64 Z = SMULFIXSAT X, Y, 32
and expanding X/Y/Z into using two i32 values.
The problem was that we sometimes did not saturate
to min when overflowing.
Here is an example using Q3.4 numbers:
Consider that we are multiplying X and Y.
X = 0x80 (-8.0 as Q3.4)
Y = 0x20 (2.0 as Q3.4)
To avoid loss of precision we do a widening
multiplication, getting a 16 bit result
Z = 0xF000 (-16.0 as Q7.8)
To detect negative overflow we should check if
the five most significant bits in Z are less than -1.
Assume that we name the 4 most significant bits
as HH and the next 4 bits as HL. Then we can do the
check by examining if
(HH < -1) or (HH == -1 && "sign bit in HL is zero").
The fault was that we have been doing the check as
(HH < -1) or (HH == -1 && HL > 0)
instead of
(HH < -1) or (HH == -1 && HL >= 0).
In our example HH is -1 and HL is 0, so the old
code did not trigger saturation and simply truncated
the result to 0x00 (0.0). With the bugfix we instead
detect that we should saturate to min, and the result
will be set to 0x80 (-8.0).
Reviewers: leonardchan, bevinh
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64331
llvm-svn: 365455
Summary:
This makes it so that IR files using triples without an environment work
out of the box, without normalizing them.
Typically, the MSVC behavior is more desirable. For example, it tends to
enable things like constant merging, use of associative comdats, etc.
Addresses PR42491
Reviewers: compnerd
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64109
llvm-svn: 365387
Don't do this locally, computeKnownBits does this better (and can handle non-constant cases as well).
A next step would be to actually simplify non-constant elements - building on what we already do in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.
llvm-svn: 365309
Summary:
The uaddo won't be removed and the addcarry will still be
dependent on the uaddo. So we'll just increase the use count
of X and Y and potentially require a COPY.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, deadalnix
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64190
llvm-svn: 365149
We previously marked all the tests with branch funnels as
`-verify-machineinstrs=0`.
This is an attempt to fix it.
1) `ICALL_BRANCH_FUNNEL` has no defs. Mark it as `let OutOperandList =
(outs)`
2) After that we hit an assert: ``` Assertion failed: (Op.getValueType()
!= MVT::Other && Op.getValueType() != MVT::Glue && "Chain and glue
operands should occur at end of operand list!"), function AddOperand,
file
/Users/francisvm/llvm/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/InstrEmitter.cpp,
line 461. ```
The chain operand was added at the beginning of the operand list. Move
that to the end.
3) After that we hit another verifier issue in the pseudo expansion
where the registers used in the cmps and jmps are not added to the
livein lists. Add the `EFLAGS` to all the new MBBs that we create.
PR39436
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54155
llvm-svn: 365058
