Reland r341269. Use std::stable_sort when sorting constant condidates.
Reverting commit, r341365:
Revert r341269: [Constant Hoisting] Hoisting Constant GEP Expressions
One of the tests is failing 50% of the time when expensive checks are
enabled. Not sure how deep the problem is so just reverting while the
author can investigate so that the bots stop repeatedly failing and
blaming things incorrectly. Will respond with details on the original
commit.
Original commit, r341269:
[Constant Hoisting] Hoisting Constant GEP Expressions
Leverage existing logic in constant hoisting pass to transform constant GEP
expressions sharing the same base global variable. Multi-dimensional GEPs are
rewritten into single-dimensional GEPs.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51396
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51654
llvm-svn: 341417
This is fix for PR38786.
First order recurrence phis were incorrectly treated as uniform,
which caused them to be vectorized as uniform instructions.
Patch by Ayal Zaks and Orivej Desh!
Reviewed by: Anna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51639
llvm-svn: 341416
There are 2 bugs shown here that were untested before:
1. We fail to perform the fold in 1/2 the possible commuted variants.
2. When the fold is done, it disregards extra uses.
llvm-svn: 341415
Recent change to deleteDeadBlocksFromLoop was not enough to
fix all the problems related to dead blocks after nontrivial
unswitching of switches.
We need to delete all the dead blocks that were created during
unswitching, otherwise we will keep having problems with phi's
or dead blocks.
This change removes all the dead blocks that are reachable from the loop,
not trying to track whether these blocks are newly created by unswitching
or not. While not completely correct, we are unlikely to get loose but
reachable dead blocks that do not belong to our loop nest.
It does fix all the failures currently known, in particular PR38778.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51519
llvm-svn: 341398
The tests attempted to check for commuted variants
of these folds, but complexity-based canonicalization
meant we had no coverage for at least 1/2 of the cases.
Also, the folds correctly check hasOneUse(), but there
was no coverage for that.
llvm-svn: 341394
Summary:
Control height reduction merges conditional blocks of code and reduces the
number of conditional branches in the hot path based on profiles.
if (hot_cond1) { // Likely true.
do_stg_hot1();
}
if (hot_cond2) { // Likely true.
do_stg_hot2();
}
->
if (hot_cond1 && hot_cond2) { // Hot path.
do_stg_hot1();
do_stg_hot2();
} else { // Cold path.
if (hot_cond1) {
do_stg_hot1();
}
if (hot_cond2) {
do_stg_hot2();
}
}
This speeds up some internal benchmarks up to ~30%.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: xbolva00, dmgreen, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50591
llvm-svn: 341386
One of the tests is failing 50% of the time when expensive checks are
enabled. Not sure how deep the problem is so just reverting while the
author can investigate so that the bots stop repeatedly failing and
blaming things incorrectly. Will respond with details on the original
commit.
llvm-svn: 341365
Load Hardening.
Wires up the existing pass to work with a proper IR attribute rather
than just a hidden/internal flag. The internal flag continues to work
for now, but I'll likely remove it soon.
Most of the churn here is adding the IR attribute. I talked about this
Kristof Beyls and he seemed at least initially OK with this direction.
The idea of using a full attribute here is that we *do* expect at least
some forms of this for other architectures. There isn't anything
*inherently* x86-specific about this technique, just that we only have
an implementation for x86 at the moment.
While we could potentially expose this as a Clang-level attribute as
well, that seems like a good question to defer for the moment as it
isn't 100% clear whether that or some other programmer interface (or
both?) would be best. We'll defer the programmer interface side of this
for now, but at least get to the point where the feature can be enabled
without relying on implementation details.
This also allows us to do something that was really hard before: we can
enable *just* the indirect call retpolines when using SLH. For x86, we
don't have any other way to mitigate indirect calls. Other architectures
may take a different approach of course, and none of this is surfaced to
user-level flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51157
llvm-svn: 341363
This patch removes the function `expandSCEVIfNeeded` which behaves not as
it was intended. This function tries to make a lookup for exact existing expansion
and only goes to normal expansion via `expandCodeFor` if this lookup hasn't found
anything. As a result of this, if some instruction above the loop has a `SCEVConstant`
SCEV, this logic will return this instruction when asked for this `SCEVConstant` rather
than return a constant value. This is both non-profitable and in some cases leads to
breach of LCSSA form (as in PR38674).
Whether or not it is possible to break LCSSA with this algorithm and with some
non-constant SCEVs is still in question, this is still being investigated. I wasn't
able to construct such a test so far, so maybe this situation is impossible. If it is,
it will go as a separate fix.
Rather than do it, it is always correct to just invoke `expandCodeFor` unconditionally:
it behaves smarter about insertion points, and as side effect of this it will choose a
constant value for SCEVConstants. For other SCEVs it may end up finding a better insertion
point. So it should not be worse in any case.
NOTE: So far the only known case for which this transform may break LCSSA is mapping
of SCEVConstant to an instruction. However there is a suspicion that the entire algorithm
can compromise LCSSA form for other cases as well (yet not proved).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51286
Reviewed By: etherzhhb
llvm-svn: 341345
The fold was implemented for the general case but use-limitation,
but the later constant version which didn't check uses was only
matching splat constants.
llvm-svn: 341292
If we have a pair of binops feeding another pair of binops, rearrange the operands so
the matching pair are together because that allows easy factorization folds to happen
in instcombine:
((X << S) & Y) & (Z << S) --> ((X << S) & (Z << S)) & Y (reassociation)
--> ((X & Z) << S) & Y (factorize shift from 'and' ops optimization)
This is part of solving PR37098:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37098
Note that there's an instcombine version of this patch attached there, but we're trying
to make instcombine have less responsibility to improve compile-time efficiency.
For reasons I still don't completely understand, reassociate does this kind of transform
sometimes, but misses everything in my motivating cases.
This patch on its own is gluing an independent cleanup chunk to the end of the existing
RewriteExprTree() loop. We can build on it and do something stronger to better order the
full expression tree like D40049. That might be an alternative to the proposal to add a
separate reassociation pass like D41574.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45842
llvm-svn: 341288
Leverage existing logic in constant hoisting pass to transform constant GEP
expressions sharing the same base global variable. Multi-dimensional GEPs are
rewritten into single-dimensional GEPs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51396
llvm-svn: 341269
It has essentially the same benefit it has on 64-bit ARM: it
substantially reduces the number of constants used by large GEP
operations. Seems to be generally helpful across a few different
codebases I've tried.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51462
llvm-svn: 341136
Summary:
Currently, the SafeStack analysis disallows out-of-bounds writes but not
out-of-bounds reads for mem intrinsics like llvm.memcpy. This could
cause leaks of pointers to the safe stack by leaking spilled registers/
frame pointers. Check for allocas used as source or destination pointers
to mem intrinsics.
Reviewers: eugenis
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: pcc, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51334
llvm-svn: 341116
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
llvm-svn: 341095
Splitting an alloca can decrease the alignment of GEPs into the
partition. Normally, rewriting accounts for this, but the code was
missing for uses of PHI nodes and select instructions.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38707 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51335
llvm-svn: 341094
We now only add +64bit to the CPU string for "generic" CPU. All other CPU names are assumed to have the feature flag already set if they support 64-bit. I've remove the implies from CMPXCHG8 so that Feature64Bit only comes in via CPUs or user passing -mattr=+64bit.
I've changed the assert to a report_fatal_error so it's not lost in Release builds.
The test updates are to fix things that tripped the new error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51231
llvm-svn: 341022
The cost modeling was not accounting for the fact we were duplicating the instruction once per predecessor. With a default threshold of 1, this meant we were actually creating #pred copies.
Adding to the fun, there is *absolutely no* test coverage for this. Simply bailing for more than one predecessor passes all checked in tests.
llvm-svn: 341001
Teach LICM to hoist stores out of loops when the store writes to a location otherwise unused in the loop, writes a value which is invariant, and is guaranteed to execute if the loop is entered.
Worth noting is that this transformation is partially overlapping with the existing promotion transformation. Reasons this is worthwhile anyway include:
* For multi-exit loops, this doesn't require duplication of the store.
* It kicks in for case where we can't prove we exit through a normal exit (i.e. we may throw), but can prove the store executes before that possible side exit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50925
llvm-svn: 340974
Summary:
Assert from PR38737 happens on the dead block inside the parent loop
after unswitching nontrivial switch in the inner loop.
deleteDeadBlocksFromLoop now takes extra care to detect/remove dead
blocks in all the parent loops in addition to the blocks from original
loop being unswitched.
Reviewers: asbirlea, chandlerc
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51415
llvm-svn: 340955
This is a follow-up to rL339604 which did the same transform
for a sin libcall. The handling of intrinsics vs. libcalls
is unfortunately scattered, so I'm just adding this next to
the existing transform for llvm.cos for now.
This should resolve PR38458:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38458
If the call was already negated, the negates will cancel
each other out.
llvm-svn: 340952
Expand the simplification of `pow(exp{,2}(x), y)` to all FP types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51195
llvm-svn: 340948
Generalize the simplification of `pow(2.0, y)` to `pow(2.0 ** n, y)` for all
scalar and vector types.
This improvement helps some benchmarks in SPEC CPU2000 and CPU2006, such as
252.eon, 447.dealII, 453.povray. Otherwise, no significant regressions on
x86-64 or A64.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49273
llvm-svn: 340947
In the PR, LoopSink was trying to sink into a catchswitch block, which
doesn't have a valid insertion point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51307
llvm-svn: 340900
In Thumb1, legal imm range is [0, 255] for ADD/SUB instructions. However, the
legal imm range for LD/ST in (R+Imm) addressing mode is [0, 127]. Imms in
[128, 255] are materialized by mov R, #imm, and LD/STs use them in (R+R)
addressing mode.
This patch checks if a constant is used as offset in (R+Imm), if so, it checks
isLegalAddressingMode passing the constant value as BaseOffset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50931
llvm-svn: 340882
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
llvm-svn: 340834
Summary:
This fixes PR31105.
There is code trying to delete dead code that does so by e.g. checking if
the single predecessor of a block is the block itself.
That check fails on a block like this
bb:
br i1 undef, label %bb, label %bb
since that has two (identical) predecessors.
However, after the check for dead blocks there is a call to
ConstantFoldTerminator on the basic block, and that call simplifies the
block to
bb:
br label %bb
Therefore we now do the call to ConstantFoldTerminator before the check if
the block is dead, so it can realize that it really is.
The original behavior lead to the block not being removed, but it was
simplified as above, and then we did a call to
Dest->replaceAllUsesWith(&*I);
with old and new being equal, and an assertion triggered.
Reviewers: chandlerc, fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51280
llvm-svn: 340820
This patch issues an error message if Darwin ABI is attempted with the PPC
backend. It also cleans up existing test cases, either converting the test to
use an alternative triple or removing the test if the coverage is no longer
needed.
Updated Tests
-------------
The majority of test cases were updated to use a different triple that does not
include the Darwin ABI. Many tests were also updated to use FileCheck, in place
of grep.
Deleted Tests
-------------
llvm/test/tools/dsymutil/PowerPC/sibling.test was originally added to test
specific functionality of dsymutil using an object file created with an old
version of llvm-gcc for a Powerbook G4. After a discussion with @JDevlieghere he
suggested removing the test.
llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/combine_loads_from_build_pair.ll was converted from a
PPC test to a SystemZ test, as the behavior is also reproducible there.
All other tests that were deleted were specific to the darwin/ppc ABI and no
longer necessary.
Phabricator Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50988
llvm-svn: 340795
This lines up with the behavior of an existing transform where if both
operands of the binop are shuffled, we allow moving the binop before the
shuffle regardless of whether the shuffle changes the size of the vector.
llvm-svn: 340787
Fix the issue of duplicating the call to `exp{,2}()` when it's nested in
`pow()`, as exposed by rL340462.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51194
llvm-svn: 340784
This reverts r319889.
Unfortunately, wrapping flags are not a part of SCEV's identity (they
do not participate in computing a hash value or in equality
comparisons) and in fact they could be assigned after the fact w/o
rebuilding a SCEV.
Grep for const_cast's to see quite a few of examples, apparently all
for AddRec's at the moment.
So, if 2 expressions get built in 2 slightly different ways: one with
flags set in the beginning, the other with the flags attached later
on, we may end up with 2 expressions which are exactly the same but
have their operands swapped in one of the commutative N-ary
expressions, and at least one of them will have "sorted by complexity"
invariant broken.
2 identical SCEV's won't compare equal by pointer comparison as they
are supposed to.
A real-world reproducer is added as a regression test: the issue
described causes 2 identical SCEV expressions to have different order
of operands and therefore compare not equal, which in its turn
prevents LoadStoreVectorizer from vectorizing a pair of consecutive
loads.
On a larger example (the source of the test attached, which is a
bugpoint) I have seen even weirder behavior: adding a constant to an
existing SCEV changes the order of the existing terms, for instance,
getAddExpr(1, ((A * B) + (C * D))) returns (1 + (C * D) + (A * B)).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40645
llvm-svn: 340777
Summary:
Patch by Marek Olsak and David Stuttard, both of AMD.
This adds a new amdgcn intrinsic supporting s.buffer.load, in particular
multiple dword variants. These are convenient to use from some front-end
implementations.
Also modified the existing llvm.SI.load.const intrinsic to common up the
underlying implementation.
This modification also requires that we can lower to non-uniform loads correctly
by splitting larger dword variants into sizes supported by the non-uniform
versions of the load.
V2: Addressed minor review comments.
V3: i1 glc is now i32 cachepolicy for consistency with buffer and
tbuffer intrinsics, plus fixed formatting issue.
V4: Added glc test.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51098
Change-Id: I83a6e00681158bb243591a94a51c7baa445f169b
llvm-svn: 340684
