Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D19559, I tried to teach CVP about range facts implied by value/value icmps (i.e. no constants.) In the meantime, we've implemented the optimization, but I couldn't find tests checked in, so adding them.
llvm-svn: 340660
Otherwise, the debug info is incorrect. On its own, this is mostly
harmless, but the safe-stack also later inlines the call to
__safestack_pointer_address, which leads to debug info with the wrong
scope, which eventually causes an assertion failure (and incorrect debug
info in release mode).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51075
llvm-svn: 340651
Summary:
Sometimes reading an output *.ll file it is not easy to understand why some callsites are not inlined. We can read output of inline remarks (option --pass-remarks-missed=inline) and try correlating its messages with the callsites.
An easier way proposed by this patch is to add to every callsite processed by Inliner an attribute with the latest message that describes the cause of not inlining this callsite. The attribute is called //inline-remark//. By default this feature is off. It can be switched on by the option //-inline-remark-attribute//.
For example in the provided test the result method //@test1// has two callsites //@bar// and inline remarks report different inlining missed reasons:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because too costly to inline (cost=-5, threshold=-6)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: bar not inlined into test1 because it should never be inlined (cost=never): recursive
It is not clear which remark correspond to which callsite. With the inline remark attribute enabled we get the reasons attached to their callsites:
define void @test1() {
call void @bar(i1 true) #0
call void @bar(i1 false) #2
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=-5, threshold=-6)" }
..
attributes #2 = { "inline-remark"="(cost=never): recursive" }
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: xbolva00, tejohnson, apilipenko
Reviewed By: xbolva00, tejohnson
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50435
llvm-svn: 340618
Once the invariant_start is reached, we know that no instruction *after* it can modify the memory. So, if we can prove the location isn't read *between entry into the loop and the execution of the invariant_start*, we can execute the invariant_start before entering the loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51181
llvm-svn: 340617
This patch makes the DoesKMove argument non-optional, to force people
to think about it. Most cases where it is false are either code hoisting
or code sinking, where we pick one instruction from a set of
equal instructions among different code paths.
Reviewers: dberlin, nlopes, efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47475
llvm-svn: 340606
When GVN sets the incoming value for a phi to undef because the incoming block
is unreachable it needs to also invalidate the cached info for that phi in
MemoryDependenceAnalysis, otherwise later queries will return stale information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51099
llvm-svn: 340529
This version of the patch fixes cleaning up ssa_copy intrinsics, so it does not
crash for instructions in blocks that have been marked unreachable.
This patch updates IPSCCP to use PredicateInfo to propagate
facts to true branches predicated by EQ and to false branches
predicated by NE.
As a follow up, we should be able to extend it to also propagate additional
facts about nonnull.
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso, dberlin, efriedma
Reviewed By: davide, dberlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45330
llvm-svn: 340525
If we have a min/max pair we can do a better job of counting sign bits if we look at them together. This is similar to what is done in the SelectionDAG version of computeNumSignBits for ISD::SMAX/SMIN.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51112
llvm-svn: 340480
Instead of asserting that the function doesn't have any unreachable
code, just ignore it for the purpose of computing liveness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51070
llvm-svn: 340456
Summary:
Add MemorySSA as a dependency to LoopSimplifyCFG and preserve it.
Disabled by default until all passes preserve MemorySSA.
Reviewers: bogner, chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50911
llvm-svn: 340445
Summary:
Add MemorySSA as a depency to LoopInstInstSimplify and preserve it.
Disabled by default until all passes preserve MemorySSA.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50906
llvm-svn: 340444
Guard widening should not spend efforts on dealing with guards with trivial true/false conditions.
Such guards can easily be eliminated by any further cleanup pass like instcombine. However we
should not unconditionally delete them because it may be profitable to widen other conditions
into such guards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50247
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 340381
CodeGenPrepare has a strategy for moving dbg.values so that a value's
definition always dominates its debug users. This cleanup was happening
too early (before certain CGP transforms were run), resulting in some
dbg.value use-before-def errors.
Perform this cleanup as late as possible to avoid use-before-def.
llvm-svn: 340370
This test shows that optimizeSelectInst splits a select and sinks a
`fdiv` operation to one side of the diamond. However, the dbg.value for
the operation isn't moved.
llvm-svn: 340369
This is preparation for landing a use-before-def verifier for debug
intrinsics (D46100).
As a drive-by, remove `tail` from debug intrinsic calls because it
doesn't mean anything in that context.
llvm-svn: 340366
Currently CodeExtractor tries to use the next node after an invoke to
place the store for the result of the invoke, if it is an out parameter
of the region. This fails, as the invoke terminates the current BB.
In that case, we can place the store in the 'normal destination' BB, as
the result will only be available in that case.
Reviewers: davidxl, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51037
llvm-svn: 340331
Currently we assign the same value number to two calls reading the same
memory location if we do not have MemoryDependence info. Without MemDep
Info we cannot guarantee that there is no store between the two calls, so we
have to assign a new number to the second call.
It also adds a new option EnableMemDep to enable/disable running
MemoryDependenceAnalysis and also renamed NoLoads to NoMemDepAnalysis to
be more explicit what it does. As it also impacts calls that read memory,
NoLoads is a bit confusing.
Reviewers: efriedma, sebpop, john.brawn, wmi
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50893
llvm-svn: 340319
Remove duplicate tests from InstCombine that were added with
D50582. I left negative tests there to verify that nothing
in InstCombine tries to go overboard. If isKnownNeverNaN is
improved to handle the FP binops or other cases, we should
have coverage under InstSimplify, so we could remove more
duplicate tests from InstCombine at that time.
llvm-svn: 340279
Summary:
Follow up change to rL339703, where we now vectorize loops with non-phi
instructions used outside the loop. Note that the cyclic dependency
identification occurs when identifying reduction/induction vars.
We also need to identify that we do not allow users where the PSCEV information
within and outside the loop are different. This was the fix added in rL307837
for PR33706.
Reviewers: Ayal, mkuper, fhahn
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50778
llvm-svn: 340278
This is a slight modification of the tests from D50582;
change half of the predicates to 'uno' so we have coverage
for that side too. All of the positive tests can fold to a
constant (true/false), so that should happen in instsimplify.
llvm-svn: 340276
This patch teaches LICM to hoist guards from the loop if they are guaranteed to execute and
if there are no side effects that could prevent that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50501
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 340256
These intrinsics are modelled as writing for control flow purposes, but they don't actually write to any location. Marking these - as we did for guards - allows LICM to hoist loads out of loops containing invariant.starts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50861
llvm-svn: 340245
NewGVN uses InstructionSimplify for simplifications of leaders of
congruence classes. It is not guaranteed that the metadata or other
flags/keywords (like nsw or exact) of the leader is available for all members
in a congruence class, so we cannot use it for simplification.
This patch adds a InstrInfoQuery struct with a boolean field
UseInstrInfo (which defaults to true to keep the current behavior as
default) and a set of helper methods to get metadata/keywords for a
given instruction, if UseInstrInfo is true. The whole thing might need a
better name, to avoid confusion with TargetInstrInfo but I am not sure
what a better name would be.
The current patch threads through InstrInfoQuery to the required
places, which is messier then it would need to be, if
InstructionSimplify and ValueTracking would share the same Query struct.
The reason I added it as a separate struct is that it can be shared
between InstructionSimplify and ValueTracking's query objects. Also,
some places do not need a full query object, just the InstrInfoQuery.
It also updates some interfaces that do not take a Query object, but a
set of optional parameters to take an additional boolean UseInstrInfo.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37540.
Reviewers: dberlin, davide, efriedma, sebpop, hiraditya
Reviewed By: hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47143
llvm-svn: 340031
