For example, given:
void fn() {
struct T *p0;
struct T { int i; } *p1;
}
-ast-print produced:
void fn() {
struct T { int i; } *p0;
struct T { int i; } *p1;
}
Compiling that fails with a redefinition error.
Given:
void fn() {
struct T *p0;
struct __attribute__((deprecated)) T *p1;
}
-ast-print dropped the attribute.
Details:
For a tag specifier (that is, struct/union/class/enum used as a type
specifier in a declaration) that was also a tag declaration (that is,
first occurrence of the tag) or tag redeclaration (that is, later
occurrence that specifies attributes or a member list), clang printed
the tag specifier as either (1) the full tag definition if one
existed, or (2) the first tag declaration otherwise. Redefinition
errors were sometimes introduced, as in the first example above. Even
when that was impossible because no member list was ever specified,
attributes were sometimes lost, thus changing semantics and
diagnostics, as in the second example above.
This patch fixes a major culprit for these problems. It does so by
creating an ElaboratedType with a new OwnedDecl member wherever an
occurrence of a tag type is a (re)declaration of that tag type.
PrintingPolicy's IncludeTagDefinition used to trigger printing of the
member list, attributes, etc. for a tag specifier by using a tag
(re)declaration selected as described above. Now, it triggers the
same thing except it uses the tag (re)declaration stored in the
OwnedDecl. Of course, other tooling can now make use of the new
OwnedDecl as well.
Also, to be more faithful to the original source, this patch
suppresses printing of attributes inherited from previous
declarations.
Reviewed by: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45463
llvm-svn: 332281
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
FunctionProtoType.
We previously re-evaluated the expression each time we wanted to know whether
the type is noexcept or not. We now evaluate the expression exactly once.
This is not quite "no functional change": it fixes a crasher bug during AST
deserialization where we would try to evaluate the noexcept specification in a
situation where we have not deserialized sufficient portions of the AST to
permit such evaluation.
llvm-svn: 331428
This is not yet part of any C++ working draft, and so is controlled by the flag
-fchar8_t rather than a -std= flag. (The GCC implementation is controlled by a
flag with the same name.)
This implementation is experimental, and will be removed or revised
substantially to match the proposal as it makes its way through the C++
committee.
llvm-svn: 331244
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
Right now we only use this information in one place, immediately after
we calculate it, but it's still nice information to have. The Swift
project is going to use this to tidy up its "API notes" feature (see
past discussion on cfe-dev that never quite converged).
Reviewed by Bruno Cardoso Lopes.
llvm-svn: 330452
framework module SomeKitCore {
...
export_as SomeKit
}
Given the module above, while generting autolink information during
codegen, clang should to emit '-framework SomeKitCore' only if SomeKit
was not imported in the relevant TU, otherwise it should use '-framework
SomeKit' instead.
rdar://problem/38269782
llvm-svn: 330152
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
The patch adds nocf_check target independent attribute for disabling checks that were enabled by cf-protection flag.
The attribute can be appertained to functions and function pointers.
Attribute name follows GCC's similar attribute name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41880
llvm-svn: 327768
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like <, !, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking
them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved
otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 326512
Original change:
[NFC] Move CommentOpts checks to the call sites that depend on it.
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
llvm-svn: 326508
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of
marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never
saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are
ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43663
llvm-svn: 326501
This patch removes the HashString function from StringExtraces and
replaces its uses with calls to djbHash from DJB.h.
This change is *almost* NFC. While the algorithm is identical, the
djbHash implementation in StringExtras used 0 as its default seed while
the implementation in DJB uses 5381. The latter has been shown to result
in less collisions and improved avalanching and is used by the DWARF
accelerator tables.
Because some test were implicitly relying on the hash order, I've
reverted to using zero as a seed for the following two files:
lld/include/lld/Core/SymbolTable.h
llvm/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43615
llvm-svn: 326091
It looks like some of our tests depend on the ordering of hashed values.
I'm reverting my changes while I try to reproduce and fix this locally.
Failing builds:
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-darwin13/builds/18388
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-x86_64-sde-avx512-linux/builds/6743
lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast/builds/15607
llvm-svn: 326082
This removes the HashString function from StringExtraces and replaces
its uses with calls to djbHash from DJB.h
This is *almost* NFC. While the algorithm is identical, the djbHash
implementation in StringExtras used 0 as its seed while the
implementation in DJB uses 5381. The latter has been shown to result in
less collisions and improved avalanching.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43615
(cherry picked from commit 77f7f965bc9499a9ae768a296ca5a1f7347d1d2c)
llvm-svn: 326081
diagnostic settings using _Pragma within a macro.
The AST writer had previously been assuming that all diagnostic state
transitions would occur within a FileID corresponding to a file. When a
diagnostic state change occured within a macro, it was unable to form a
location for that state change and would instead corrupt the diagnostic state
of the "root" node (and thus that of the main compilation).
Also introduce a "#pragma clang __debug diag_mapping" debugging utility
that I added to track this issue down.
llvm-svn: 324695
The skipped preprocessor ranges are now serialized in the AST PCH file. This fixes, for example, libclang's clang_getSkippedRanges() returning zero ranges after reparsing a translation unit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20124
llvm-svn: 322503
The patch fixes r321395, that cuased
-Werror=unused-but-set-variable issue for
Diagnosed var on prod build.
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 321854
Extend the hashing to functions, which allows detection of function definition
mismatches across modules. This is a re-commit of r320230.
llvm-svn: 321395
The current code would hit an assert in ASTWriter when trying to write
out the filename for a line table entry that didn't have any. Fix this
by allowing the -1 sentinel value to round-trip through serialization.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40746
llvm-svn: 319707
When mixing PCH and Implicit Modules, missing a header search path
can lead to the implicit built PCM to complaint about not finding its
matching module map.
Instead of adding more magic to implicit modules engine, add a note to
help the user add the appropriate path.
rdar://problem/33388847
llvm-svn: 318503
When a preamble ends in a conditional preprocessor block that is being
skipped, the preprocessor needs to continue skipping that block when
the preamble is used.
This fixes PR34570.
llvm-svn: 317308
This is breaking a build of https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp and so
likely not really NFC. Also reverted subsequent r314956/7.
I'll forward reproduction instructions to Richard.
llvm-svn: 315439
In its place, track on the canonical function declaration whether there is a
declaration with a body (and if so, which one). This brings function definition
handling in line with what we do in all other contexts, and is necessary to
allow us to merge declarations within multiple definitions of the same function
(eg, PR33924).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 314955
This patch relates to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33666 This adds support
for template parameters to be passed to the address_space attribute.
The main goal is to add further flexibility to the attribute and allow
for it to be used easily with templates.
The main additions are a new type (DependentAddressSpaceType) alongside
its TypeLoc and its mangling. As well as the logic required to support
dependent address spaces which mainly resides in TreeTransform.h and
SemaType.cpp.
llvm-svn: 314649
Introduce a new "export_as" directive for top-level modules, which
indicates that the current module is a "private" module whose symbols
will eventually be exported through the named "public" module. This is
in support of a common pattern in the Darwin ecosystem where a single
public framework is constructed of several private frameworks, with
(currently) header duplication and some support from the linker.
Addresses rdar://problem/34438420.
llvm-svn: 313316
This is a recommit of r312781; in some build configurations
variable names are omitted, so changed the new regression
test accordingly.
llvm-svn: 312794
This adds _Float16 as a source language type, which is a 16-bit floating point
type defined in C11 extension ISO/IEC TS 18661-3.
In follow up patches documentation and more tests will be added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33719
llvm-svn: 312781
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312220
Extend the -fmodule-file option to support the [<name>=]<file> value format.
If the name is omitted, then the old semantics is preserved (the module file
is loaded whether needed or not). If the name is specified, then the mapping
is treated as just another prebuilt module search mechanism, similar to
-fprebuilt-module-path, and the module file is only loaded if actually used
(e.g., via import). With one exception: this mapping also overrides module
file references embedded in other modules (which can be useful if module files
are moved/renamed as often happens during remote compilation).
This override semantics requires some extra work: we now store the module name
in addition to the file name in the serialized AST representation.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35020
llvm-svn: 312105
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
CurrentDir was set as the path of the current module, but that can change as
part of a chain of loaded modules.
When we try to locate a file mentioned in a module that does not exist, we use
a heuristic to look at the relative path between the original location of the
module and the file we look for, and use that relatively to the CurrentDir.
This only works if CurrentDir is the same as the (current) path of the module
file the file was mentioned in; if it is not, we look at the path relatively to
the wrong directory, and can end up reading random unrelated files that happen
to have the same name.
This patch fixes this by using the BaseDirectory of the module file the file
we look for was mentioned in instead of the CurrentDir heuristic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35828
llvm-svn: 308962
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
