search. NFCI.
Migrate single-use and non-volatility, non-indexed requirements on
stores of immediate store values to candidate collection pass from
later stage.
llvm-svn: 332392
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
ExtendSetCCUses updates SETCC nodes which use a load (OriginalLoad) to
reflect a simplification to the load (ExtLoad).
Based on my reading, ExtendSetCCUses may create new nodes to extend a
constant attached to a SETCC. It also creates fresh SETCC nodes which
refer to any updated operands.
ISTM that the location applied to the new constant and SETCC nodes
should be the same as the location of the ExtLoad.
This was suggested by Adrian in https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46216
llvm-svn: 332119
This teaches tryToFoldExtOfLoad to set the right location on a
newly-created extload. With that in place, the logic for performing a
certain ([s|z]ext (load ...)) combine becomes identical for sexts and
zexts, and we can get rid of one copy of the logic.
The test case churn is due to dependencies on IROrders inherited from
the wrong SDLoc.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46158
llvm-svn: 332118
Part of the logic for combining (zext (load ...)) and (sext (load ...))
is duplicated. This creates problems because bugs in one version have to
be fixed again in the other version.
To address this, as a first step, I've extracted the duplicate logic
into a helper. I'll fix the debug location bug in the helper and
eliminate the copy of its logic in a followup.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46157
llvm-svn: 332117
Summary:
The combine in rebuildSetCC may be combined to another
node leaving our references stale. Keep a handle on
it to avoid stale references.
Fixes PR36602.
Reviewers: dbabokin, RKSimon, eli.friedman, davide
Subscribers: hiraditya, uabelho, JesperAntonsson, qcolombet, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46404
llvm-svn: 331985
Previously if !LegalOperations we would blindly call getBitcast and hope that getNode would constant fold it. But if the conversion is between a vector and a scalar, getNode has no simplification.
This means we would just get back the original N. We would then return that N which would make the caller of visitBITCAST think that we used CombineTo and did our own worklist management. This prevents target specific optimizations from being called for vector/scalar bitcasts until after legal operations.
llvm-svn: 331896
The previous value of 8192 resulted in severe compile time hits in
some pathological cases.
rdar://39781410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46581
llvm-svn: 331888
Summary:
Split off from D46031.
The previous patch, D46493, completely disabled unfolding in case of immediates.
But we can do better:
{F6120274} {F6120277}
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/xJS
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46494
llvm-svn: 331685
Summary:
Split off from D46031.
In masked merge case, this degrades IPC by decreasing instruction count.
{F6108777}
The next patch should be able to recover and improve this.
This also affects the transform @spatel have added in D27489 / rL289738,
and the test coverage for X86 was missing.
But after i have added it, and looked at the changes in MCA, i'm somewhat confused.
{F6093591} {F6093592} {F6093593}
I'd say this regression is an improvement, since `IPC` increased in that case?
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46493
llvm-svn: 331684
Summary:
Split off form D46031.
It seems we don't want to transform the pattern if the `xor`'s are actually `not`'s.
In vector case, this breaks `andnpd` / `vandnps` patterns.
That being said, we may want to re-visit this `not` handling, maybe in D46073.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46492
llvm-svn: 331595
Inspired by r331508, I did a grep and found these.
Mostly just change from dyn_cast to cast. Some cases also showed a dyn_cast result being converted to bool, so those I changed to isa.
llvm-svn: 331577
Summary: Adding support for Fast flags in the SDNode to leverage fast math sub flag usage.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, jbhateja, hfinkel, escha, qcolombet, echristo, wristow, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rampitec, nhaehnle, tstellar, FarhanaAleen, nemanjai, javed.absar, jbhateja, hfinkel, wdng
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45710
llvm-svn: 331547
The logic for this combine is almost identical to the logic for a
(sext (sextload x)) combine.
This commit factors out the logic so it can be shared by both combines,
and corrects the SDLoc assigned in the zext version of the combine.
Prior to this patch, for the given test case, we would apply the
location associated with the udiv instruction to instructions which
perform the load.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
llvm-svn: 331303
Prior to this patch, for the given test case, we would apply the
location associated with the sdiv instruction to instructions which
perform the load.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46222
llvm-svn: 331302
In DAGCombiner, we try to simplify this pattern:
([s|z]ext (load ...))
Conceptually, a new extload which is created while splitting the load
should have the same debug location as the load.
Making this change affects the IROrder of the new load, causing some
test case churn.
In practice, the new location is never different from the location of
the [s|z]ext, at least not during check-llvm or a stage2 build.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46156
llvm-svn: 331301
Setting the right SDLoc on a newly-created zextload fixes a line table
bug which resulted in non-linear stepping behavior.
Several backend tests contained CHECK lines which relied on the IROrder
inherited from the wrong SDLoc. This patch breaks that dependence where
feasbile and regenerates test cases where not.
In some cases, changing a node's IROrder may alter register allocation
and spill behavior. This can affect performance. I have chosen not to
prevent this by applying a "known good" IROrder to SDLocs, as this may
hide a more general bug in the scheduler, or cause regressions on other
test inputs.
rdar://33755881, Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995
llvm-svn: 331300
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
Summary:
D42479 (rL329525) enabled SDIV combine for pow2 non-splat vector
dividers. But when there is a 1 in a vector, the instruction sequence to
be generated involves shifting a value by the number of its bit widths,
which is undefined
(c64f4dbfe3/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp (L6000-L6006)).
Especially, in architectures that do not support vector instructions,
each of element in a vector will be computed separately using scalar
operations, and then the resulting value will be undef for '1' values
in a vector.
(All 1's vector is fine; only vectors mixed with 1 and others will be
affected.)
Reviewers: RKSimon, jgravelle-google
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46161
llvm-svn: 331092
As noted, the attribute name is subject to change once we have
the clang side implemented, but it's clear that we need some
kind of attribute-based predication here based on the discussion
for:
rL330437
llvm-svn: 330951
As discussed in the post-review comments for rL330437,
we need to guard this fold to allow existing code to
keep working with the undefined behavior that they've
come to rely on.
That would mean duplicating more code than we already
have, so let's fix that first.
llvm-svn: 330947
We were previously prefering ZEXTLOAD over EXTLOAD if it is legal. This triggers during X86's promotion of i16->i32. Not sure about other targets.
Using ZEXTLOAD can prevent folding it to SEXTLOAD later if we were to promote a sign extended operand like we would need for SRA. However, X86 doesn't currently promote i16 SRA. I was looking into doing that which is how I found this issue.
This is also blocking our ability to fold 4 byte aligned EXTLOADs with "loadi32". This is what caused most of the test changes here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45585#inline-402825
llvm-svn: 330781
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andl`+`andn`/`andps`+`andnps` / `bic`/`bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`).
So we need to make sure that they are still generated.
If the mask is constant, we do nothing. InstCombine should have unfolded it.
Else, i use `hasAndNot()` TLI hook.
For now, only handle scalars.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/bO6
----
I *really* don't like the code i wrote in `DAGCombiner::unfoldMaskedMerge()`.
It is super fragile. Is there something like IR Pattern Matchers for this?
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, courbet, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, rengolin, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45733
llvm-svn: 330646
This was originally committed at rL328921 and reverted at rL329920 to
investigate failures in Chrome. This time I've added to the ReleaseNotes
to warn users of the potential of exposing UB and let me repeat that
here for more exposure:
Optimization of floating-point casts is improved. This may cause surprising
results for code that is relying on undefined behavior. Code sanitizers can
be used to detect affected patterns such as this:
int main() {
float x = 4294967296.0f;
x = (float)((int)x);
printf("junk in the ftrunc: %f\n", x);
return 0;
}
$ clang -O1 ftrunc.c -fsanitize=undefined ; ./a.out
ftrunc.c:5:15: runtime error: 4.29497e+09 is outside the range of
representable values of type 'int'
junk in the ftrunc: 0.000000
Original commit message:
fptosi / fptoui round towards zero, and that's the same behavior as ISD::FTRUNC,
so replace a pair of casts with the equivalent node. We don't have to account for
special cases (NaN, INF) because out-of-range casts are undefined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44909
llvm-svn: 330437
This is a transform that I limited in instcombine in rL329821 because it was
creating more instructions in IR when the cast has multiple uses.
But if the cast is free, then we can do the transform regardless of other
uses because it improves the potential throughput of the calculation by
removing a dependency on the fneg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45598
llvm-svn: 330098
This change is exposing UB in source code - as was warned/predicted. :)
See D44909 for discussion. Reverting while we figure out how to fix things.
llvm-svn: 329920
Recommitting r329283, third time lucky...
If the SRL node is only used by an AND, we may be able to set the
ExtVT to the width of the mask, making the AND redundant. To support
this, another check has been added in isLegalNarrowLoad which queries
whether the load is valid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41350
llvm-svn: 329551
In our real world application, we found the following optimization is missed in DAGCombiner
(zext (and/or/xor (shl/shr (load x), cst), cst)) -> (and/or/xor (shl/shr (zextload x), (zext cst)), (zext cst))
If the user of original zext is an add, it may enable further lea optimization on x86.
This patch add a new function CombineZExtLogicopShiftLoad to do this optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44402
llvm-svn: 329516
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, MatzeB, RKSimon
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45133
llvm-svn: 329435
Recommitting rL321259. Previosuly this caused an issue with PPCBE but
I didn't receieve a reproducer and didn't have the time to follow up.
If the issue appears again, please provide a reproducer so I can fix
it.
Original commit message:
If the SRL node is only used by an AND, we may be able to set the
ExtVT to the width of the mask, making the AND redundant. To support
this, another check has been added in isLegalNarrowLoad which queries
whether the load is valid.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41350
llvm-svn: 329160
fptosi / fptoui round towards zero, and that's the same behavior as ISD::FTRUNC,
so replace a pair of casts with the equivalent node. We don't have to account for
special cases (NaN, INF) because out-of-range casts are undefined.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44909
llvm-svn: 328921
The code has bugs dealing with -0.0.
Since D44550 introduced FABS pattern folding in InstCombine,
this patch removes the now-redundant code that causes
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36600.
Patch by Mikhail Dvoretckii!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44683
llvm-svn: 328872
Currently EVT is in the IR layer only because of Function.cpp needing a very small piece of the functionality of EVT::getEVTString(). The rest of EVT is used in codegen making CodeGen a better place for it.
The previous code converted a Type* to EVT and then called getEVTString. This was only expected to handle the primitive types from Type*. Since there only a few primitive types, we can just print them as strings directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45017
llvm-svn: 328806
This is used by llvm tblgen as well as by LLVM Targets, so the only
common place is Support for now. (maybe we need another target for these
sorts of things - but for now I'm at least making them correct & we can
make them better if/when people have strong feelings)
llvm-svn: 328395
In our real world application, we found the following optimization is missed in DAGCombiner
(zext (and/or/xor (shl/shr (load x), cst), cst)) -> (and/or/xor (shl/shr (zextload x), (zext cst)), (zext cst))
If the user of original zext is an add, it may enable further lea optimization on x86.
This patch add a new function CombineZExtLogicopShiftLoad to do this optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44402
llvm-svn: 328252
I had to modify the bswap recognition to allow unshrunk masks to make this work.
Fixes PR36689.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44442
llvm-svn: 327530
BUILD_VECTORs aren't themselves legalized until LegalizeDAG so we should still be able to create an "illegal" one before that. This helps combine with BUILD_VECTORS that are introduced during LegalizeVectorOps due to unrolling.
llvm-svn: 327446
Under some circumstances the divrems won't have been combined together before getting to this code.
So replace the assertion with a if() guard to not expand to X-((X/C)*C) to give the other combine chance to happen.
Reduced from OSS-Fuzz #6883https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=6883
llvm-svn: 327424
