This uses [teyit](https://pypi.org/project/teyit/) to modernize asserts,
as recommended by the [unittest release
notes](https://docs.python.org/3.12/whatsnew/3.12.html#id3).
For example, `assertTrue(a == b)` is replaced with `assertEqual(a, b)`.
This produces better error messages, e.g. `error: unexpectedly found 1
and 2 to be different` instead of `error: False`.
assertEquals is a deprecated alias for assertEqual and has been removed
in Python 3.12. This wasn't an issue previously because we used a
vendored version of the unittest module. Now that we use the built-in
version this gets updated together with the Python version used to run
the test suite.
This formatter
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78609
was originally passing the signed seconds (which can refer to times in
the past) with an unsigned printf formatter, and had tests that expected
to see negative values from the printf which always failed on macOS. I'm
not clear how they ever passed on any platform.
Fix the printf to print seconds as a signed value, and re-enable the
tests.
On macOS, the formatter is printing signed values as
unsigned, it seems, and the tests are expecting correctly
signed values. These tests were added in
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78609
Starting with macOS 14, the `NSTimeZone` and `CFTimeZone` types are backed by swift
implementations. These tests won't pass on mainline lldb, since it doesn't have Swift
support.
This is a followup of #76983 and adds the libc++ data formatters for
- weekday,
- weekday_indexed,
- weekday_last,
- month_weekday,
- month_weekday_last,
- year_month,
- year_month_day_last
- year_month_weekday, and
- year_month_weekday_last.
This adds a subset of the C++20 calendar data formatters:
- day,
- month,
- year,
- month_day,
- month_day_last, and
- year_month_day.
A followup patch will add the missing calendar data formatters:
- weekday,
- weekday_indexed,
- weekday_last,
- month_weekday,
- month_weekday_last,
- year_month,
- year_month_day_last
- year_month_weekday, and
- year_month_weekday_last.
These tests were failing on the LLDB public matrix build-bots for older
clang versions:
```
clang-7: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-nostdlib++' [-Wunused-command-line-argument]
error: invalid value 'c++20' in '-std=c++20'
note: use 'c++98' or 'c++03' for 'ISO C++ 1998 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++98' or 'gnu++03' for 'ISO C++ 1998 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++11' for 'ISO C++ 2011 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++11' for 'ISO C++ 2011 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++14' for 'ISO C++ 2014 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++14' for 'ISO C++ 2014 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++17' for 'ISO C++ 2017 with amendments' standard
note: use 'gnu++17' for 'ISO C++ 2017 with amendments and GNU extensions' standard
note: use 'c++2a' for 'Working draft for ISO C++ 2020' standard
note: use 'gnu++2a' for 'Working draft for ISO C++ 2020 with GNU extensions' standard
make: *** [main.o] Error 1
```
The test fails because we try to compile it with `-std=c++20` (which is
required for std::chrono::{days,weeks,months,years}) on clang versions
that don't support the `-std=c++20` flag.
We could change the test to conditionally compile the C++20 parts of the
test based on the `-std=` flag and have two versions of the python
tests, one for the C++11 chrono features and one for the C++20 features.
This patch instead just disables the test on older clang versions
(because it's simpler and we don't really lose important coverage).
This is relanding of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69253.
`TestTemplatePackArgs.py` is passing now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68012/files added new data
formatters for LibStdC++ std::variant.
However, this formatter can crash if std::variant's index field has
invalid value (exceeds the number of template arguments).
This can happen if the current IP stops at a place std::variant is not
initialized yet.
This patch fixes the crash by ensuring the index is a valid value and
fix GetNthTemplateArgument() to make sure it is not crashing.
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
The underlying timezone classes are being reimplemented in Swift, and these
strings will be Swift strings, without the ObjC `@` prefix. Leaving off the `@`
makes these tests usable both before and after the reimplmentation of
Foundation in Swift.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68012/files added new data
formatters for LibStdC++ std::variant.
However, this formatter can crash if std::variant's index field has
invalid value (exceeds the number of template arguments).
This can happen if the current IP stops at a place std::variant is not
initialized yet.
This patch fixes the crash by ensuring the index is a valid value.
---------
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
To get the number of children for a VectorType (i.e.,
a type declared with a `vector_size`/`ext_vector_type` attribute)
LLDB previously did following calculation:
1. Get byte-size of the vector container from Clang (`getTypeInfo`).
2. Get byte-size of the element type we want to interpret the array as.
(e.g., sometimes we want to interpret an `unsigned char vec[16]`
as a `float32[]`).
3. `numChildren = containerSize / reinterpretedElementSize`
However, for step 1, clang will return us the *aligned* container
byte-size.
So for a type such as `float __attribute__((ext_vector_type(3)))`
(which is an array of 3 4-byte floats), clang will round up the
byte-width of the array to `16`.
(see
[here](ab6a66dbec/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp (L1987-L1992)))
This means that for vectors where the size isn't a power-of-2, LLDB
will miscalculate the number of elements.
**Solution**
This patch changes step 1 such that we calculate the container size
as `numElementsInSource * byteSizeOfElement`.
The type formatter code is effectively considering empty strings as read
errors, which is wrong. The fix is very simple. We should rely on the
error object and stop checking the size. I also added a test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68012 works on my CentOS Linux
and Macbook but seems to fail for certain build bots. The error log
complains "No Value" check failure for `std::variant` but not very
actionable without a reproduce.
To unblock the build bots, I am commenting out the "No Value" checks.
Co-authored-by: jeffreytan81 <jeffreytan@fb.com>
(motivated by test failures after D157058)
With D157058 the base template for `std::char_traits` was removed from
libc++. Quoting the release notes:
```
The base template for ``std::char_traits`` has been removed. If you are using
``std::char_traits`` with types other than ``char``, ``wchar_t``, ``char8_t``,
``char16_t``, ``char32_t`` or a custom character type for which you
specialized ``std::char_traits``, your code will no longer work.
```
This patch simply removes all such instantiations to make sure the
tests that run against the latest libc++ version pass.
One could try testing the existence of this base template from within
the test source files but this doesn't seem like something we want
support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D157636
When printing the root of a value, if it's a reference its children are unconditionally
printed - in contrast to pointers whose children are only printed if a sufficient
pointer depth is given.
However, the children are printed even when there's a summary provider that says not to.
If a summary provider exists, this change consults it to determine if children should be
printed.
For example, given a variable of type `std::string &`, this change has the following
effect:
Before:
```
(lldb) p string_ref
(std::string &) string_ref = "one two three four five six seven eight nine ten": {
__r_ = {
std::__1::__compressed_pair_elem<std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char> >::__rep, 0, false> = {
__value_ = {
= {
__l = (__data_ = "one two three four five six seven eight nine ten", __size_ = 48, __cap_ = 64, __is_long_ = 1)
__s = (__data_ = "@\0p\U00000001\0`\0\00\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@", __padding_ = "\x80t<", __size_ = '\0', __is_long_ = '\x01')
__r = {
__words ={...}
}
}
}
}
}
}
```
After:
```
(lldb) p string_ref
(std::string &) string_ref = "one two three four five six seven eight nine ten"
```
rdar://73248786
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151748
Following tests are now passing on LLDB AArch64 Windows buildbot:
lldb-api :: commands/expression/deleting-implicit-copy-constructor/TestDeletingImplicitCopyConstructor.py
lldb-api :: functionalities/data-formatter/data-formatter-categories/TestDataFormatterCategories.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/constructors/TestCppConstructors.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/namespace/TestNamespace.py
lldb-api :: lang/cpp/this_class_type_mixing/TestThisClassTypeMixing.py
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/219/builds/3012
This patch removes XFAIL decorator from all of the above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151268
This is an ongoing series of commits that are reformatting our Python
code. Reformatting is done with `black` (23.1.0).
If you end up having problems merging this commit because you have made
changes to a python file, the best way to handle that is to run `git
checkout --ours <yourfile>` and then reformat it with black.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-document-and-standardize-python-code-style
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151460
This mimicks the implementation of the libstdcpp std::unique_ptr
formatter.
This has been attempted several years ago in
`0789722d85cf1f1fdbe2ffb2245ea0ba034a9f94` but was reverted in
`e7dd3972094c2f2fb42dc9d4d5344e54a431e2ce`.
The difference to the original patch is that we now maintain
a `$$dereference$$` member and we only store weak pointers
to the other children inside the synthetic frontend. This is
what the libc++ formatters do to prevent the recursion mentioned
in the revert commit.
Since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a
expression evaluation failure in TestDataFormatterSynthVal.py.
This patch marks the expression evaluation part as skipped while rest
of the test passes.
This patch aslo introduces a new helper isAArch64Windows in lldbtest.py.
This patch fixes libstdc++ data formatter for reference/pointer to std::string.
The failure testcases are added which succeed with the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150313
This patch add or removes XFAIL decorator from various tests which were marked
xfail for windows.
since 44363f2 various tests have started passing but introduced a couple of new failures.
Weight is in favor of new XPasses and I have removed XFail decorator from them. Also
some new tests have started failing for which we need to file separate bugs. I have
marked them xfail for now and will add the bug id after investigating the issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149235
The unique_ptr prettyprinter calls `GetValueOfLibCXXCompressedPair`,
which looks for a `__value_` child. However, when the second value in
the compressed pair is not an empty class, there are two `__value_`
children because `__compressed_pair` derives twice from
`__compressed_pair_elem`, one for each member of the pair. And then the
lookup fails because it's ambiguous.
This patch makes the following changes:
- Rename `GetValueOfLibCXXCompressedPair` to
`GetFirstValueOfLibCXXCompressedPair`, and add a similar function to
get the second value. Put both functions in
Plugin/Language/CPlusPlus/LibCxx.cpp because it seems inappropriate to
have libcxx-specific helpers separate from all the libcxx-dependent
code.
- Read the second value of the `__ptr_` pair and display a "deleter"
child in the unique_ptr synthetic child provider, when available.
- Add a test case for the non-empty deleter case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148662
(Addresses GH#62153)
The `SBType` APIs to retrieve details about template arguments,
such as `GetTemplateArgumentType` or `GetTemplateArgumentKind`
don't "desugar" LValueReferences/RValueReferences or pointers.
So when we try to format a `std::deque&`, the python call to
`GetTemplateArgumentType` fails to get a type, leading to
an `element_size` of `0` and a division-by-zero python exception
(which gets caught by the summary provider silently). This leads
to the contents of such `std::deque&` to be printed incorrectly.
This patch dereferences the reference/pointer before calling
into the above SBAPIs.
**Testing**
* Add API test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D148531
With this patch, whenever we emit a `DW_AT_type` for some declaration
and the type is a template class with a `clang::PreferredNameAttr`, we
will emit the typedef that the attribute refers to instead. I.e.,
```
0x123 DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name "var"
DW_AT_type (0x123 "basic_string<char>")
0x124 DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name "basic_string<char>"
```
...becomes
```
0x123 DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name "var"
DW_AT_type (0x124 "std::string")
0x124 DW_TAG_structure_type
DW_AT_name "basic_string<char>"
0x125 DW_TAG_typedef
DW_AT_name "std::string"
DW_AT_type (0x124 "basic_string<char>")
```
We do this by returning the preferred name typedef `DIType` when
we create a structure definition. In some cases, e.g., with `-gmodules`,
we don't complete the structure definition immediately but do so later
via `completeClassData`, which overwrites the `TypeCache`. In such cases
we don't actually want to rewrite the cache with the preferred name. We
handle this by returning both the definition and the preferred typedef
from `CreateTypeDefinition` and let the callee decide what to do with
it.
Essentially we set up the types as:
```
TypeCache[Record] => DICompositeType
ReplaceMap[Record] => DIDerivedType(baseType: DICompositeType)
```
For now we keep this behind LLDB tuning.
**Testing**
- Added clang unit-test
- `check-llvm`, `check-clang` pass
- Confirmed that this change correctly repoints
`basic_string` references in some of my test programs.
- Will add follow-up LLDB API tests
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145803
With this patch member-function pointers are formatted using
`CXXFunctionPointerSummaryProvider`.
This turns,
```
(lldb) v pointer_to_member_func
(void (Foo::*)()) ::pointer_to_member_func = 0x00000000000000000000000100003f94
```
into
```
(lldb) v pointer_to_member_func
(void (Foo::*)()) ::pointer_to_member_func = 0x00000000000000000000000100003f94 (a.out`Foo::member_func() at main.cpp:3)
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145242
Before this patch, LLDB used to format pointers to members, such as,
```
void (Foo::*pointer_to_member_func)() = &Foo::member_func;
```
as `eFormatBytes`. E.g.,
```
(lldb) v pointer_to_member_func
(void (Foo::*)()) $1 = 94 3f 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
```
This patch makes sure we format pointers to member functions the same
way we do regular function pointers.
After this patch we format member pointers as:
```
(lldb) v pointer_to_member_func
(void (Foo::*)()) ::pointer_to_member_func = 0x00000000000000000000000100003f94
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145241
This patch adds a test for formatting of member function pointers.
This was split from https://reviews.llvm.org/D145242, which caused
this test case to fail on Windows buildbots.
I split this out in order to make sure that this indeed works on Windows
without the D145242 patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145487
