Utkarsh Saxena b3ce872851 Make evaluation of nested requirement consistent with requires expr. ...

Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/45563
```
template<class T>  concept True = true;

template <class T>
concept C1 = requires (T) {
   requires True<typename T::value> || True<T>;
};

template <class T>
constexpr bool foo()
requires True<typename T::value> || True<T> {
    return true;
}
static_assert(C1<double>); // Previously failed due to SFINAE error
static_assert(foo<int>()); // but this works fine.
```
The issue here is the discrepancy between how a [nested requirement is evaluated](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateInstantiate.cpp#L2331) Vs how a [non-nested requirement is evaluated](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Sema/SemaConcept.cpp#L167-L200).

This patch makes constraint checking consistent for nested requirement
and trailing requires expressions by reusing the same evaluator.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138914

2022-12-19 20:22:03 +01:00

61 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw