Richard Smith efd009de1c When we see 'Class(X' or 'Class::Class(X' and we suspect that it names a ...

constructor, but X is not a known typename, check whether the tokens could
possibly match the syntax of a declarator before concluding that it isn't
a constructor. If it's definitely ill-formed, assume it is a constructor.

Empirical evidence suggests that this pattern is much more often a
constructor with a typoed (or not-yet-declared) type name than any of the
other possibilities, so the extra cost of the check is not expected to be
problematic.

llvm-svn: 153488

2012-03-27 00:56:56 +00:00

2.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw