Files
clang-p2996/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/member-function-pointer-calls.cpp
Alex Richardson 90179f2323 [NFC] Add a comment to member-function-pointer-calls.cpp
Looking at this test I did not see why MinGW was using a different command
line until I looked at the git history. Add a comment explaining what this
RUN line is actually testing. Also add two more RUN lines to show that
indirectly passed member pointers don't inhibit the optimization.
2021-09-28 17:57:36 +01:00

36 lines
1.3 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm -O3 -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager -o - | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm -O3 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -o - | FileCheck %s
/// Check that we pass the member pointers indirectly for MinGW64
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-windows-gnu -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s -check-prefix MINGW64
/// We should be able to optimize calls via the indirectly passed member pointers
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-windows-gnu -emit-llvm -O3 -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager -o - | FileCheck %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-windows-gnu -emit-llvm -O3 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -o - | FileCheck %s
struct A {
virtual int vf1() { return 1; }
virtual int vf2() { return 2; }
};
int f(A* a, int (A::*fp)()) {
return (a->*fp)();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @_Z2g1v()
// CHECK-NOT: }
// CHECK: ret i32 1
// MINGW64-LABEL: define dso_local i32 @_Z2g1v()
// MINGW64: call i32 @_Z1fP1AMS_FivE(%struct.A* %{{.*}}, { i64, i64 }* %{{.*}})
int g1() {
A a;
return f(&a, &A::vf1);
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} i32 @_Z2g2v()
// CHECK-NOT: }
// CHECK: ret i32 2
// MINGW64-LABEL: define dso_local i32 @_Z2g2v()
// MINGW64: call i32 @_Z1fP1AMS_FivE(%struct.A* %{{.*}}, { i64, i64 }* %{{.*}})
int g2() {
A a;
return f(&a, &A::vf2);
}