Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can eventually share more of its implementation. Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in DWARFv4. Reapply8e04896288which was reverted ina8154e5e0c.
4.3 KiB
4.3 KiB