After pr96656.ll were added to LAA and LoopVersioning, it was decided that the bug is in a caller of LoopVersioning, not in LAA or LoopVersioning itself. The new candidate was LoopLoadElim, but #96656 has since been marked invalid. Hence, re-organize the added tests to avoid confusion, and the testcase from the investigation to LoopLoadElim.
4.2 KiB
4.2 KiB