@dmpots and I were investigating a crash when he was developing LLDB
earlier. When I loaded the core I was surprised to see LLDB didn't have
information for the SI_CODE. Upon inspection we had an si_code of `128`,
which is the decimal of SI_KERNEL at `0x80`.
These were overlooked in my last addition of the negative si_codes, and
this patch adds SI_USER and SI_KERNEL to the list, covering us for all
the codes available to all signals.
[Linux reference
link](74b4cc9b87/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h (L175))

I kept the code naming the same as what is defined in the Linux source
code. SI_KERNEL to my understanding usually indicates something went
awry in the Kernel itself, but I think adding that additional detail
would not be helpful to most users. @DavidSpickett I'd appreciate your
insight into that.
12 KiB
12 KiB