Sanjoy Das 5c8bead46d [IndVars] Don't break dominance in eliminateIdentitySCEV
Summary:
After r249211, `getSCEV(X) == getSCEV(Y)` does not guarantee that X and
Y are related in the dominator tree, even if X is an operand to Y (I've
included a toy example in comments, and a real example as a test case).

This commit changes `SimplifyIndVar` to require a `DominatorTree`.  I
don't think this is a problem because `ScalarEvolution` requires it
anyway.

Fixes PR25051.

Depends on D13459.

Reviewers: atrick, hfinkel

Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13460

llvm-svn: 249471
2015-10-06 21:44:49 +00:00
2015-10-06 18:53:12 +00:00
2015-10-06 20:35:15 +00:00
Description
No description provided
2.4 GiB
Languages
LLVM 42%
C++ 31%
C 13%
Assembly 9.3%
MLIR 1.4%
Other 2.8%