Pavel Labath fb8df8cb65 [lldb/DWARF] s/DWARFRangeList/llvm::DWARFAddressRangeVector (#116620) ...

The main difference is that the llvm class (just a std::vector in
disguise) is not sorted. It turns out this isn't an issue because the
callers either:
- ignore the range list;
- convert it to a different format (which is then sorted);
- or query the minimum value (which is faster than sorting)

The last case is something I want to get rid of in a followup as a part
of removing the assumption that function's entry point is also its
lowest address.

2024-12-13 14:29:59 +01:00

4.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw