Usman Nadeem 5fb57131b7 [DFAJumpThreading] Don't bail early after encountering unpredictable values (#119774) ...

After #96127 landed, mshockwave reported that the pass was no longer
threading SPEC2006/perlbench.

After 96127 we started bailing out in `getStateDefMap` and rejecting the
transformation because one of the unpredictable values was coming from
inside the loop. There was no fundamental change in that function except
that we started calling `Loop->contains(IncomingBB)` instead of
`LoopBBs.count(IncomingBB)`. After some analysis I came to the
conclusion that even before 96127 we would reject the transformation if
we provided large enough limits on the path traversal (large enough so
that LoopBBs contained blocks corresponding to that unpredictable
value).

In this patch I changed `getStateDefMap` to not terminate early on
finding an unpredictable value, this is because
`getPathsFromStateDefMap`, later, actually has checks to ensure that the
final list of paths only have predictable values. As a result we can now
partially thread functions like `negative6` in the tests that have some
predictable paths.

This patch does not really have any compile-time impact on the test
suite without `-dfa-early-exit-heuristic=false` (early exit is enabled
by default).

Change-Id: Ie1633b370ed4a0eda8dea52650b40f6f66ef49a3

2024-12-25 01:29:01 -08:00

51 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw