Summary: There is an error in the shared TSD registry logic when looking for a TSD in the slow path. There is an unlikely event when a TSD's precedence was 0 after attempting a `tryLock` which indicated that it was grabbed by another thread in between. We dealt with that case by continuing to the next iteration, but that meant that the `Index` was not increased and we ended up trying to lock the same TSD. This would manifest in heavy contention, and in the end we would still lock a TSD, but that was a wasted iteration. So, do not `continue`, just skip the TSD as a potential candidate. This is in both the standalone & non-standalone versions. Reviewers: morehouse, eugenis, vitalybuka, hctim Reviewed By: morehouse Subscribers: delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63783 llvm-svn: 364345
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB