Roman Lebedev 0727e2b90c [DAGCombiner][X86][AArch64] Generalize A-(A&B)->A&(~B) fold (PR44448) ...

The fold 'A - (A & (B - 1))' -> 'A & (0 - B)'
added in 8dab0a4a7d
is too specific. It should/can just be 'A - (A & B)' -> 'A & (~B)'

Even if we don't manage to fold `~` into B,
we have likely formed `ANDN` node.
Also, this way there's less similar-but-duplicate folds.

Name: X - (X & Y)  ->  X & (~Y)
%o = and i32 %X, %Y
%r = sub i32 %X, %o
  =>
%n = xor i32 %Y, -1
%r = and i32 %X, %n

https://rise4fun.com/Alive/kOUl

See
  https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499

2020-01-03 17:55:47 +03:00

4.3 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw