(In reference to 5901d82ea0)
Consider when `Input[I]` is a `VarDecl` with parameter pack. We would
have already expanded the pack before the code change in the loop`for
(unsigned I = 0; I != *NumExpansions; ++I) {`.
Now in `if (RetainExpansion) {`, without this change, we continue to
substitute the pack in the pattern even when we do not have meaningful
`ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndex` set.
This leads to use of an invalid pack substitution index in
`TemplateInstantiator::TransformFunctionParmPackRefExpr` in
`TransformedDecl = (*Pack)[getSema().ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndex];`
This change sets `ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndex` to `-1` while retaining
expansion to instruct `TransformFunctionParmPackRefExpr` to build
`FunctionParmPackExpr` instead of substituting the param pack.
---
There are other instances of `RetainExpansion` and IIUC, they should
also unset the `ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndex`. It would be great if
someone can verify my understanding. If this is correct then we could
instead have a `ArgumentPackSubstitutionIndexRAII` as part of
`ForgetPartiallySubstitutedPackRAII`.
EDIT: I have moved this to `ForgetPartiallySubstitutedPackRAII`.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/63819
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/107560
8.6 KiB
8.6 KiB