c72675394a
The reason is to add .yaml as a valid test suffix. The test folder contains one yaml file, which wasn't being run because of that. Unsurprisingly the test fails, but this was not because the underlying functionality was broken, but rather because the test was setup incorrectly (most likely due to overly aggressive simplification of the test data on my part). Therefore this patch also tweaks the test inputs in order to test what they are supposed to test, and also updates some other breakpad tests (because they depend on the same inputs as this one) to be more realistic -- specifically it avoids putting symbols to the first page of the module, as that's where normally the COFF header would reside.
57 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
57 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
# REQUIRES: x86
|
|
|
|
# RUN: yaml2obj %S/Inputs/unwind-via-stack-win.yaml > %t
|
|
# RUN: %lldb -c %t \
|
|
# RUN: -o "target symbols add %S/Inputs/unwind-via-stack-win.syms" \
|
|
# RUN: -s %s -b | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
# First check that unwind plan generation works correctly.
|
|
# This function has a "typical" unwind rule.
|
|
image show-unwind -n call_many
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: image show-unwind -n call_many
|
|
# CHECK: UNWIND PLANS for unwind-via-stack-win.exe`call_many
|
|
# CHECK: Symbol file UnwindPlan:
|
|
# CHECK: This UnwindPlan originally sourced from breakpad STACK WIN
|
|
# CHECK: This UnwindPlan is sourced from the compiler: yes.
|
|
# CHECK: This UnwindPlan is valid at all instruction locations: no.
|
|
# CHECK: Address range of this UnwindPlan: [unwind-via-stack-win.exe..module_image + 4112-0x0000107d)
|
|
# CHECK: row[0]: 0: CFA=DW_OP_breg7 +0, DW_OP_consts +80, DW_OP_plus => esp=DW_OP_pick 0x00, DW_OP_consts +4, DW_OP_plus eip=DW_OP_pick 0x00, DW_OP_deref
|
|
|
|
# Then, some invalid rules.
|
|
image show-unwind -n bogus_rule
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: image show-unwind -n bogus_rule
|
|
# CHECK: UNWIND PLANS for unwind-via-stack-win.exe`bogus_rule
|
|
# CHECK-NOT: Symbol file
|
|
|
|
image show-unwind -n bogus_cfa_rhs
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: image show-unwind -n bogus_cfa_rhs
|
|
# CHECK: UNWIND PLANS for unwind-via-stack-win.exe`bogus_cfa_rhs
|
|
# CHECK-NOT: Symbol file
|
|
|
|
image show-unwind -n bogus_esp_rhs
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: image show-unwind -n bogus_esp_rhs
|
|
# CHECK: UNWIND PLANS for unwind-via-stack-win.exe`bogus_esp_rhs
|
|
# CHECK-NOT: Symbol file
|
|
|
|
# We don't treat unknown lhs as an error, as it can be just a temporary
|
|
# variable used in other rules.
|
|
image show-unwind -n temporary_var
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: image show-unwind -n temporary_var
|
|
# CHECK: UNWIND PLANS for unwind-via-stack-win.exe`temporary_var
|
|
# CHECK: Symbol file UnwindPlan:
|
|
# CHECK: This UnwindPlan originally sourced from breakpad STACK WIN
|
|
# CHECK: This UnwindPlan is sourced from the compiler: yes.
|
|
# CHECK: This UnwindPlan is valid at all instruction locations: no.
|
|
# CHECK: Address range of this UnwindPlan: [unwind-via-stack-win.exe..module_image + 4400-0x00001134)
|
|
# CHECK: row[0]: 0: CFA=DW_OP_breg7 +0 => esp=DW_OP_pick 0x00, DW_OP_consts +4, DW_OP_plus eip=DW_OP_pick 0x00, DW_OP_deref
|
|
|
|
# And finally, check that backtracing works as a whole by unwinding a simple
|
|
# stack.
|
|
thread backtrace
|
|
# CHECK-LABEL: thread backtrace
|
|
# CHECK: frame #0: 0x000b1092 unwind-via-stack-win.exe`many_pointer_args
|
|
# CHECK: frame #1: 0x000b1079 unwind-via-stack-win.exe`call_many + 105
|
|
# CHECK: frame #2: 0x000b1085 unwind-via-stack-win.exe`main + 5
|
|
# CHECK: frame #3: 0x77278494 kernel32.dll
|
|
# CHECK-NOT: frame
|