As pointed out in D96244, "Module" is already pretty overloaded to refer to clang and llvm modules. (And clangd deals directly with the former). FeatureModule is a bit of a mouthful but it's pretty self-descriptive. I think it might be better than "Component" which doesn't really capture the "common interface" aspect - it's IMO confusing to refer to "components" but exclude CDB for example. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97950
1.1 KiB
1.1 KiB