Artem Dergachev ff1fc21e8a [analyzer] Suppress more MallocChecker positives in smart pointer destructors. ...

r326249 wasn't quite enough because we often run out of inlining stack depth
limit and for that reason fail to see the atomics we're looking for.

Add a more straightforward false positive suppression that is based on the name
of the class. I.e. if we're releasing a pointer in a destructor of a "something
shared/intrusive/reference/counting something ptr/pointer something", then any
use-after-free or double-free that occurs later would likely be a false
positive.

rdar://problem/38013606

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44281

llvm-svn: 328066

2018-03-21 00:49:47 +00:00

2.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw