My previoust test case had skipped CUs from one TU out of a two-TU LTO scenario, which meant the CU index wasn't needed (as it was unambiguous which CU a table entry applied to) - expanding the test to use 3 TUs, skipping one (so long as it's not the last one) shows the indexes are miscomputed. Fix that with a little indirection for the index. llvm-svn: 340646
25 KiB
25 KiB