Files
clang-p2996/lldb/test/API/lang/cpp/diamond/TestCppDiamond.py
Michael Buch a4c18137d8 [lldb][test] Remove duplicate testcase names in API test-suite (#97043)
In one of my recent PRs I mistakenly had two test-cases with the same
name, preventing one of them to run. Since it's an easy mistake to make
(e.g., copy pasting existing test-cases), I ran following sanity-check
script over `lldb/test/API`, which found couple of tests which were
losing coverage because of this (or in some cases simply had duplicate
tests):
```
import ast
import sys

filename = sys.argv[1]
print(f'Checking {filename}...')
tree = ast.parse(open(filename, 'r').read())

for node in ast.walk(tree):
    if not isinstance(node, ast.ClassDef):
        continue

    func_names = []
    for child in ast.iter_child_nodes(node):
        if isinstance(child, ast.FunctionDef):
            func_names.append(child.name)

    seen_func_names = set()
    duplicate_func_names = []
    for name in func_names:
        if name in seen_func_names:
            duplicate_func_names.append(name)
        else:
            seen_func_names.add(name)

    if len(duplicate_func_names) != 0:
        print(f'Multiple func names found:\n\t{duplicate_func_names}\n\tclass {node.name}\n\tfile: {filename}')
```

This patch fixes these cases.
2024-06-28 20:08:53 +01:00

121 lines
4.0 KiB
Python

"""
Test diamond inheritance.
"""
import lldb
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
import lldbsuite.test.lldbutil as lldbutil
class TestCase(TestBase):
@no_debug_info_test
def test_with_sbvalue(self):
"""
Test that virtual base classes work in when SBValue objects are
used to explore the class.
"""
self.build()
lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
self, "// breakpoint 1", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp")
)
self.runCmd("settings set target.prefer-dynamic-value no-dynamic-values")
j1 = self.frame().FindVariable("j1")
j1_Derived1 = j1.GetChildAtIndex(0)
j1_Derived2 = j1.GetChildAtIndex(1)
j1_Derived1_VBase = j1_Derived1.GetChildAtIndex(0)
j1_Derived2_VBase = j1_Derived2.GetChildAtIndex(0)
j1_Derived1_VBase_m_value = j1_Derived1_VBase.GetChildAtIndex(0)
j1_Derived2_VBase_m_value = j1_Derived2_VBase.GetChildAtIndex(0)
self.assertEqual(
j1_Derived1_VBase.GetLoadAddress(),
j1_Derived2_VBase.GetLoadAddress(),
"ensure virtual base class is the same between Derived1 and Derived2",
)
self.assertEqual(
j1_Derived1_VBase_m_value.GetValueAsUnsigned(1),
j1_Derived2_VBase_m_value.GetValueAsUnsigned(2),
"ensure m_value in VBase is the same",
)
self.assertEqual(
self.frame()
.FindVariable("d")
.GetChildAtIndex(0)
.GetChildAtIndex(0)
.GetValueAsUnsigned(0),
12345,
"ensure Derived2 from j1 is correct",
)
# This reassigns 'd' to point to 'j2'.
self.thread().StepOver()
self.assertEqual(
self.frame()
.FindVariable("d")
.GetChildAtIndex(0)
.GetChildAtIndex(0)
.GetValueAsUnsigned(0),
12346,
"ensure Derived2 from j2 is correct",
)
@no_debug_info_test
def test(self):
self.build()
lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
self, "// breakpoint 1", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp")
)
# All the children of j1.
children = [
ValueCheck(
type="Derived1",
children=[
ValueCheck(
type="VBase",
children=[
ValueCheck(type="int", name="m_value", value="12345")
],
)
],
),
ValueCheck(
type="Derived2",
children=[
ValueCheck(
type="VBase",
children=[
ValueCheck(type="int", name="m_value", value="12345")
],
)
],
),
ValueCheck(type="long", value="1"),
]
# Try using the class with expression evaluator/variable paths.
self.expect_expr("j1", result_type="Joiner1", result_children=children)
self.expect_var_path("j1", type="Joiner1", children=children)
# Use the expression evaluator to access the members.
self.expect_expr("j1.x", result_type="long", result_value="1")
self.expect_expr("j1.m_value", result_type="int", result_value="12345")
# Use variable paths to access the members.
self.expect_var_path("j1.x", type="long", value="1")
@expectedFailureAll
@no_debug_info_test
def test_invalid_member(self):
self.build()
lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint(
self, "// breakpoint 1", lldb.SBFileSpec("main.cpp")
)
# FIXME: This is completely broken and 'succeeds' with an error that
# there is noch such value/member in Joiner1. Move this up to the test
# above when fixed.
self.expect_var_path("j1.m_value", type="int", value="12345")