This reverts commit a80053322b.
The new asserts exposed an underlying issue where the expanded bounds
could wrap, causing the parts of the code to incorrectly determine that
accesses do not overlap.
Reproducer below based on @mstorsjo's test case.
opt -passes='print<access-info>'
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-Fi8-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
define i32 @j(ptr %P, i32 %x, i32 %y) {
entry:
%gep.P.4 = getelementptr inbounds nuw i8, ptr %P, i32 4
%gep.P.8 = getelementptr inbounds nuw i8, ptr %P, i32 8
br label %loop
loop:
%1 = phi i32 [ %x, %entry ], [ %sel, %loop.latch ]
%iv = phi i32 [ %y, %entry ], [ %iv.next, %loop.latch ]
%gep.iv = getelementptr inbounds i64, ptr %gep.P.8, i32 %iv
%l = load i32, ptr %gep.iv, align 4
%c.1 = icmp eq i32 %l, 3
br i1 %c.1, label %loop.latch, label %if.then
if.then: ; preds = %for.body
store i64 0, ptr %gep.iv, align 4
%l.2 = load i32, ptr %gep.P.4
br label %loop.latch
loop.latch:
%sel = phi i32 [ %l.2, %if.then ], [ %1, %loop ]
%iv.next = add nsw i32 %iv, 1
%c.2 = icmp slt i32 %iv.next, %sel
br i1 %c.2, label %loop, label %exit
exit:
%res = phi i32 [ %iv.next, %loop.latch ]
ret i32 %res
}
121 KiB
121 KiB