Summary: Skipping them was clearly not intentional. It's impossible to guarantee correctness if the bodies are skipped. Also adds a test case for r327504, now that it does not produce invalid errors that made the test fail. Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sammccall, rsmith Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: rayglover-ibm, rwols, cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44480 llvm-svn: 333538
44 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
44 lines
1.3 KiB
C++
// We run clang in completion mode to force skipping of function bodies and
|
|
// check if the function bodies were skipped by observing the warnings that
|
|
// clang produces.
|
|
// RUN: not %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -code-completion-at=%s:42:1 %s -o - 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
auto not_skipped() {
|
|
int x;
|
|
if (x = 10) {}
|
|
// Check that this function is not skipped.
|
|
// CHECK: 8:9: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
auto lambda_not_skipped = []() {
|
|
int x;
|
|
if (x = 10) {}
|
|
// Check that this function is not skipped.
|
|
// CHECK: 17:9: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
auto skipped() -> T {
|
|
int x;
|
|
if (x = 10) {}
|
|
// Check that this function is skipped.
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: 26:9: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses
|
|
return 1;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
auto lambda_skipped = []() -> int {
|
|
int x;
|
|
if (x = 10) {}
|
|
// This could potentially be skipped, but it isn't at the moment.
|
|
// CHECK: 34:9: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses
|
|
return 1;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int test() {
|
|
int complete_in_this_function;
|
|
// CHECK: COMPLETION: complete_in_this_function
|
|
}
|