This commit is part of the migration of towards the new STEA syntax/design. In particular, this commit includes the following changes:
* Renaming compiler-internal functions/methods:
* `SparseTensorEncodingAttr::{getDimLevelType => getLvlTypes}`
* `Merger::{getDimLevelType => getLvlType}` (for consistency)
* `sparse_tensor::{getDimLevelType => buildLevelType}` (to help reduce confusion vs actual getter methods)
* Renaming external facets to match:
* the STEA parser and printer
* the C and Python bindings
* PyTACO
However, the actual renaming of the `DimLevelType` itself (along with all the "dlt" names) will be handled in a separate commit.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D150330
Add C and python bindings for InferShapedTypeOpInterface
and ShapedTypeComponents. This allows users to invoke
InferShapedTypeOpInterface for ops that implement it.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149494
Outlining is particularly interesting when the outlined function is
replaced with something else, e.g., a microkernel. It is good to have a
handle to the call in this case.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149849
Removed builder is the same as default builder, with the added benefit that python bindings will be generated for the default builder.
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149508
Right now the bindings assume that all DenseElementsAttrs correspond to tensor values,
making it impossible to create vector-typed constants. I didn't want to change the API
significantly, so I opted for reusing the current signature of `.get`. Its `type` argument
now accepts both element types (in which case `shape` and `signless` can be specified too),
or a shaped type, which specifies the full type of the created attr (`shape` cannot be specified
in that case).
Reviewed By: ftynse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D145053
The old "pointer/index" names often cause confusion since these names clash with names of unrelated things in MLIR; so this change rectifies this by changing everything to use "position/coordinate" terminology instead.
In addition to the basic terminology, there have also been various conventions for making certain distinctions like: (1) the overall storage for coordinates in the sparse-tensor, vs the particular collection of coordinates of a given element; and (2) particular coordinates given as a `Value` or `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, vs particular coordinates given as `ValueRange` or similar. I have striven to maintain these distinctions
as follows:
* "p/c" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when there is no risk of confusion. (Just like we use "d/l" to abbreviate "dim/lvl".)
* "pos/crd" are used for individual position/coordinate values, when a longer name is helpful to avoid ambiguity or to form compound names (e.g., "parentPos"). (Just like we use "dim/lvl" when we need a longer form of "d/l".)
I have also used these forms for a handful of compound names where the old name had been using a three-letter form previously, even though a longer form would be more appropriate. I've avoided renaming these to use a longer form purely for expediency sake, since changing them would require a cascade of other renamings. They should be updated to follow the new naming scheme, but that can be done in future patches.
* "coords" is used for the complete collection of crd values associated with a single element. In the runtime library this includes both `std::vector` and raw pointer representations. In the compiler, this is used specifically for buffer variables with C++ type `Value`, `TypedValue<MemRefType>`, etc.
The bare form "coords" is discouraged, since it fails to make the dim/lvl distinction; so the compound names "dimCoords/lvlCoords" should be used instead. (Though there may exist a rare few cases where is is appropriate to be intentionally ambiguous about what coordinate-space the coords live in; in which case the bare "coords" is appropriate.)
There is seldom the need for the pos variant of this notion. In most circumstances we use the term "cursor", since the same buffer is reused for a 'moving' pos-collection.
* "dcvs/lcvs" is used in the compiler as the `ValueRange` analogue of "dimCoords/lvlCoords". (The "vs" stands for "`Value`s".) I haven't found the need for it, but "pvs" would be the obvious name for a pos-`ValueRange`.
The old "ind"-vs-"ivs" naming scheme does not seem to have been sustained in more recent code, which instead prefers other mnemonics (e.g., adding "Buf" to the end of the names for `TypeValue<MemRefType>`). I have cleaned up a lot of these to follow the "coords"-vs-"cvs" naming scheme, though haven't done an exhaustive cleanup.
* "positions/coordinates" are used for larger collections of pos/crd values; in particular, these are used when referring to the complete sparse-tensor storage components.
I also prefer to use these unabbreviated names in the documentation, unless there is some specific reason why using the abbreviated forms helps resolve ambiguity.
In addition to making this terminology change, this change also does some cleanup along the way:
* correcting the dim/lvl terminology in certain places.
* adding `const` when it requires no other code changes.
* miscellaneous cleanup that was entailed in order to make the proper distinctions. Most of these are in CodegenUtils.{h,cpp}
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144773
Previously we only allowed the flattened list passed in, but the same
input provided here as to buildGeneric so flatten accordingly. We have
less info here than in buildGeneric so the error is more generic if
unpacking fails.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D143240
`applyTransforms` now takes an optional mapping to be associated with
trailing block arguments of the top-level transform op, in addition to
the payload root. This allows for more advanced forms of communication
between C++ code and the transform dialect interpreter, in particular
supplying operations without having to re-match them during
interpretation.
Reviewed By: shabalin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142559
Use the recently introduced transform dialect parameter mechanism to
perform controllable multi-size tiling with sizes computed at the
transformation time rather than at runtime.
This requires to generalize tile and split structured transform
operations to work with any transform dialect handle types, which is
desirable in itself to avoid unchecked overuse of PDL OperationType.
Reviewed By: shabalin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D140980
For cases where we can automatically construct the Attribute allow for more
user-friendly input. This is consistent with C++ builder generation as well
choice of which single builder to generate here (most
specialized/user-friendly).
Registration of attribute builders from more pythonic input is all Python side.
The downside is that
* extra checking to see if user provided a custom builder in op builders,
* the ODS attribute name is load bearing
upside is that
* easily change these/register dialect specific ones in downstream projects,
* adding support/changing to different convenience builders are all along with
the rest of the convenience functions in Python (and no additional changes
to tablegen file or recompilation needed);
Allow for both building with Attributes as well as raw inputs. This change
should therefore be backwards compatible as well as allow for avoiding
recreating Attribute where already available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139568
The pipeline string must now include the pass manager's anchor op. This
makes the parse API properly roundtrip the printed form of a pass
manager.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136405
This diff causes the `tblgen`-erated print() function to skip printing a
`DefaultValuedAttr` attribute when the value is equal to the default.
This feature will reduce the amount of custom printing code that needs to be
written by users a relatively common scenario. As a motivating example, for the
fastmath flags in the LLVMIR dialect, we would prefer to print this:
```
%0 = llvm.fadd %arg0, %arg1 : f32
```
instead of this:
```
%0 = llvm.fadd %arg0, %arg1 {fastmathFlags = #llvm.fastmath<none>} : f32
```
This diff makes the handling of print functionality for default-valued attributes
standard.
This is an updated version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D135398, without the per-attribute bit to control printing.
Reviewed By: Mogball
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135993
Add a new OperationType handle type to the Transform dialect. This
transform type is parameterized by the name of the payload operation it
can point to. It is intended as a constraint on transformations that are
only applicable to a specific kind of payload operations. If a
transformation is applicable to a small set of operation classes, it can
be wrapped into a transform op by using a disjunctive constraint, such
as `Type<Or<[Transform_ConcreteOperation<"foo">.predicate,
Transform_ConcreteOperation<"bar">.predicate]>>` for its operand without
modifying this type. Broader sets of accepted operations should be
modeled as specific types.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135586
Use the recently introduced TransformTypeInterface instead of hardcoding
the PDLOperationType. This will allow the operations to use more
specific transform types to express pre/post-conditions in the future.
It requires the syntax and Python op construction API to be updated.
Dialect extensions will be switched separately.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135584
This is a followup to D135004, to correct one of the tests that didn't get caught by the buildbot.
Reviewed By: aartbik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135336
This extension to the sparse tensor type system in MLIR
opens up a whole new set of sparse storage schemes, such as
block sparse storage (e.g. BCSR) and ELL (aka jagged diagonals).
This revision merely introduces the type extension and
initial documentation. The actual interpretation of the type
(reading in tensors, lowering to code, etc.) will follow.
Reviewed By: Peiming
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135206
tensor.empty/linalg.init_tensor produces an uninititalized tensor that can be used as a destination operand for destination-style ops (ops that implement `DestinationStyleOpInterface`).
This change makes it possible to implement `TilingInterface` for non-destination-style ops without depending on the Linalg dialect.
RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-add-tensor-from-shape-operation/65101
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135129
Introduce a new attribute to represent the strided memref layout. Strided
layouts are omnipresent in code generation flows and are the only kind of
layouts produced and supported by a half of operation in the memref dialect
(view-related, shape-related). However, they are internally represented as
affine maps that require a somewhat fragile extraction of the strides from the
linear form that also comes with an overhead. Furthermore, textual
representation of strided layouts as affine maps is difficult to read: compare
`affine_map<(d0, d1, d2)[s0, s1] -> (d0*32 + d1*s0 + s1 + d2)>` with
`strides: [32, ?, 1], offset: ?`. While a rudimentary support for parsing a
syntactically sugared version of the strided layout has existed in the codebase
for a long time, it does not go as far as this commit to make the strided
layout a first-class attribute in the IR.
This introduces the attribute and updates the tests that using the pre-existing
sugared form to use the new attribute instead. Most memref created
programmatically, e.g., in passes, still use the affine form with further
extraction of strides and will be updated separately.
Update and clean-up the memref type documentation that has gotten stale and has
been referring to the details of affine map composition that are long gone.
See https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-materialize-strided-memref-layout-as-an-attribute/64211.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132864
This reland includes changes to the Python bindings.
Switch variadic operand and result segment size attributes to use the
dense i32 array. Dense integer arrays were introduced primarily to
represent index lists. They are a better fit for segment sizes than
dense elements attrs.
Depends on D131801
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131803
Introduce two different failure propagation mode in the Transform
dialect's Sequence operation. These modes specify whether silenceable
errors produced by nested ops are immediately propagated, thus stopping
the sequence, or suppressed. The latter is useful in end-to-end
transform application scenarios where the user cannot correct the
transformation, but it is robust enough to silenceable failures. It
can be combined with the "alternatives" operation. There is
intentionally no default value to avoid favoring one mode over the
other.
Downstreams can update their tests using:
S='s/sequence \(%.*\) {/sequence \1 failures(propagate) {/'
T='s/sequence {/sequence failures(propagate) {/'
git grep -l transform.sequence | xargs sed -i -e "$S"
git grep -l transform.sequence | xargs sed -i -e "$T"
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131774
Switch variadic operand and result segment size attributes to use the
dense i32 array. Dense integer arrays were introduced primarily to
represent index lists. They are a better fit for segment sizes than
dense elements attrs.
Depends on D131738
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131702
e179532284 removed the Type field from attributes and
arith::ConstantOp argument is now a TypedAttrInterface which isn't
supported by the python generator.
This patch temporarily restore the functionality for arith.constant but
won't generalize: we need to work on the generator instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130878
Introduce a structured transform op that emits IR computing the multi-tile
sizes with requested parameters (target size and divisor) for the given
structured op. The sizes may fold to arithmetic constant operations when the
shape is constant. These operations may then be used to call the existing
tiling transformation with a single non-zero dynamic size (i.e. perform
strip-mining) for each of the dimensions separately, thus achieving multi-size
tiling with optional loop interchange. A separate test exercises the entire
script.
Depends On D129217
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129287
Extend the definition of the Tile structured transform op to enable it
accepting handles to operations that produce tile sizes at runtime. This is
useful by itself and prepares for more advanced tiling strategies. Note that
the changes are relevant only to the transform dialect, the tiling
transformation itself already supports dynamic sizes.
Depends On D129216
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129217
This handle manipulation operation allows one to define a new handle that is
associated with a the same payload IR operations N times, where N can be driven
by the size of payload IR operation list associated with another handle. This
can be seen as a sort of broadcast that can be used to ensure the lists
associated with two handles have equal numbers of payload IR ops as expected by
many pairwise transform operations.
Introduce an additional "expensive" check that guards against consuming a
handle that is assocaited with the same payload IR operation more than once as
this is likely to lead to double-free or other undesired effects.
Depends On D129110
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129216
This Transform dialect op allows one to merge the lists of Payload IR
operations pointed to by several handles into a single list associated with one
handle. This is an important Transform dialect usability improvement for cases
where transformations may temporarily diverge for different groups of Payload
IR ops before converging back to the same script. Without this op, several
copies of the trailing transformations would have to be present in the
transformation script.
Depends On D129090
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129110
Introduce a new transformation on structured ops that splits the iteration
space into two parts along the specified dimension. The index at which the
splitting happens may be static or dynamic. This transformation can be seen as
a rudimentary form of index-set splitting that only supports the splitting
along hyperplanes parallel to the iteration space hyperplanes, and is therefore
decomposable into per-dimension application.
It is a key low-level transformation that enables independent scheduling for
different parts of the iteration space of the same op, which hasn't been
possible previously. It may be used to implement, e.g., multi-sized tiling. In
future, peeling can be implemented as a combination of split-off amount
computation and splitting.
The transformation is conceptually close to tiling in its separation of the
iteration and data spaces, but cannot be currently implemented on top of
TilingInterface as the latter does not properly support `linalg.index`
offsetting.
Note that the transformation intentionally bypasses folding of
`tensor.extract_slice` operations when creating them as this folding was found
to prevent repeated splitting of the same operation because due to internal
assumptions about extract/insert_slice combination in dialect utilities.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129090
Introduce transform ops for "for" loops, in particular for peeling, software
pipelining and unrolling, along with a couple of "IR navigation" ops. These ops
are intended to be generalized to different kinds of loops when possible and
therefore use the "loop" prefix. They currently live in the SCF dialect as
there is no clear place to put transform ops that may span across several
dialects, this decision is postponed until the ops actually need to handle
non-SCF loops.
Additionally refactor some common utilities for transform ops into trait or
interface methods, and change the loop pipelining to be a returning pattern.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127300
These ops complement the tiling/padding transformations by transforming
higher-level named structured operations such as depthwise convolutions into
lower-level and/or generic equivalents that are better handled by some
downstream transformations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126698
Python bindings for extensions of the Transform dialect are defined in separate
Python source files that can be imported on-demand, i.e., that are not imported
with the "main" transform dialect. This requires a minor addition to the
ODS-based bindings generator. This approach is consistent with the current
model for downstream projects that are expected to bundle MLIR Python bindings:
such projects can include their custom extensions into the bundle similarly to
how they include their dialects.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126208
