f21704e080
There is a bug when initial exec is relaxed to local exec.
In the following situation:
InitExec.c
```
extern __thread unsigned TGlobal;
unsigned getConst(unsigned*);
unsigned addVal(unsigned, unsigned*);
unsigned GetAddrT() {
return addVal(getConst(&TGlobal), &TGlobal);
}
```
Def.c
```
__thread unsigned TGlobal;
unsigned getConst(unsigned* A) {
return *A + 3;
}
unsigned addVal(unsigned A, unsigned* B) {
return A + *B;
}
```
The problem is in InitExec.c but Def.c is required if you want to link the example and see the problem.
To compile everything:
```
clang -O3 -mcpu=pwr10 -c InitExec.c
clang -O3 -mcpu=pwr10 -c Def.c
ld.lld InitExec.o Def.o -o IeToLe
```
If you objdump the problem object file:
```
$ llvm-objdump -dr --mcpu=pwr10 InitExec.o
```
you will get the following assembly:
```
0000000000000000 <GetAddrT>:
0: a6 02 08 7c mflr 0
4: f0 ff c1 fb std 30, -16(1)
8: 10 00 01 f8 std 0, 16(1)
c: d1 ff 21 f8 stdu 1, -48(1)
10: 00 00 10 04 00 00 60 e4 pld 3, 0(0), 1
0000000000000010: R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL_PCREL34 TGlobal
18: 14 6a c3 7f add 30, 3, 13
0000000000000019: R_PPC64_TLS TGlobal
1c: 78 f3 c3 7f mr 3, 30
20: 01 00 00 48 bl 0x20
0000000000000020: R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC getConst
24: 78 f3 c4 7f mr 4, 30
28: 30 00 21 38 addi 1, 1, 48
2c: 10 00 01 e8 ld 0, 16(1)
30: f0 ff c1 eb ld 30, -16(1)
34: a6 03 08 7c mtlr 0
38: 00 00 00 48 b 0x38
0000000000000038: R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC addVal
```
The lines of interest are:
```
10: 00 00 10 04 00 00 60 e4 pld 3, 0(0), 1
0000000000000010: R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL_PCREL34 TGlobal
18: 14 6a c3 7f add 30, 3, 13
0000000000000019: R_PPC64_TLS TGlobal
1c: 78 f3 c3 7f mr 3, 30
```
Which once linked gets turned into:
```
10010210: ff ff 03 06 00 90 6d 38 paddi 3, 13, -28672, 0
10010218: 00 00 00 60 nop
1001021c: 78 f3 c3 7f mr 3, 30
```
The problem is that register 30 is never set after the optimization.
Therefore it is not correct to relax the above instructions by replacing
the add instruction with a nop.
Instead the add instruction should be replaced with a copy (mr) instruction.
If the add uses the same resgiter as input and as ouput then it is safe to
continue to replace the add with a nop.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95262
56 KiB
56 KiB